Methods and compositions for evaluating genetic markers

ABSTRACT

Aspects of the invention relates to methods and compositions that are useful to reduce bias and increase the reproducibility of multiplex analysis of genetic loci. In some configurations, predetermined preparative steps and/or nucleic acid sequence analysis techniques are used in multiplex analyses for a plurality of genetic loci in a plurality of samples.

RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 15/231,687, filed Aug. 8, 2016, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/266,862, filed Mar. 13, 2012, which is a national phase application that claims the benefit of, and priority to, international PCT Application No. PCT/US2010/001293, filed Apr. 30, 2010, which claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/174,470, filed Apr. 30, 2009, U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/178,923, filed May 15, 2009, U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/179,358, filed May 18, 2009, and U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/182,089, filed May 28, 2009, the entire contents of each of which are incorporated herein by reference.

FIELD OF INVENTION

The invention relates to methods and compositions for determining genotypes in patient samples.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Information about the genotype of a subject is becoming more important and relevant for a range of healthcare decisions as the genetic basis for many diseases, disorders, and physiological characteristics is further elucidated. Medical advice is increasingly personalized, with individual decisions and recommendations being based on specific genetic information. Information about the type and number of alleles at one or more genetic loci impacts disease risk, prognosis, therapeutic options, and genetic counseling amongst other healthcare considerations.

For cost-effective and reliable medical and reproductive counseling on a large scale, it is important to be able correctly and unambiguously identify the allelic status for many different genetic loci in many subjects.

Numerous technologies have been developed for detecting and analyzing nucleic acid sequences from biological samples. These technologies can be used to genotype subjects and determine the allelic status of any locus of interest. However, they are not sufficiently robust and cost-effective to be scaled up for reliable high throughput analysis of many genetic loci in large numbers of patients. The frequency of incorrect or ambiguous calls is too high for current technology to manage large numbers of patient samples without involving expensive and time-consuming steps to resolve uncertainties and provide confidence in the information output.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Aspects of the invention relate to preparative and analytical methods and compositions for evaluating genotypes, and in particular, for determining the allelic identity (or identities in a diploid organism) of one or more genetic loci in a subject.

Aspects of the invention are based, in part, on the identification of different sources of ambiguity and error in genetic analyses, and, in part, on the identification of one or more approaches to avoid, reduce, recognize, and/or resolve these errors and ambiguities at different stages in a genetic analysis.

According to aspects of the invention, certain types of genetic information can be under-represented or over-represented in a genetic analysis due to a combination of stochastic variation and systematic bias in any of the preparative stages (e.g., capture, amplification, etc.), determining stages (e.g., allele-specific detection, sequencing, etc.), data interpretation stages (e.g., determining whether the assay information is sufficient to identify a subject as homozygous or heterozygous), and/or other stages.

According to aspects of the invention, error or ambiguity may be apparent in a genetic analysis, but not readily resolved without running additional samples or more expensive assays (e.g., array-based assays may report no-calls due to noisy/low signal). According to further aspects of the invention, error or ambiguity may not be accounted for in a genetic analysis and incorrect base calls may be made even when the evidence for them is limited and/or not statistically significant (e.g., next-generation sequencing technologies may report base calls even if the evidence for them is not statistically significant). According to further aspects of the invention error or ambiguity may be problematic for a multi-step genetic analysis because it is apparent but not readily resolved in one or more steps of the analysis and not apparent or accounted for in other steps of the analysis.

In some embodiments, sources of error and ambiguity in one or more steps can be addressed by capturing and/or interrogating each target locus of interest with one or more sets of overlapping probes that are designed to overcome any systematic bias or stochastic effects that may impact the complexity and/or fidelity of the genetic information that is generated.

In some embodiments, sources of error and ambiguity in one or more steps can be addressed by capturing and/or interrogating each target locus of interest with at least one set of probes, wherein different probes are labeled with different identifiers that can be used to track the assay reactions and determine whether certain types of genetic information are under-represented or over-represented in the information that is generated.

In some embodiments, errors and ambiguities associated with the analysis of regions containing large numbers of sequence repeats are addressed by systematically analyzing frequencies of certain nucleic acids at particular stages in an assay (e.g., at a capture, sequencing, or detection stage). It should be appreciated that such techniques may be particularly useful in the context of a standardized protocol that is designed to allow many different loci to be evaluated in parallel without requiring different assay procedures for each locus. In some embodiments, the use of a single detection modality (e.g., sequencing) to assay multiple types of genetic lesions (e.g., point mutations, insertions/deletions, length polymorphisms) is advantageous in the clinical setting. In some embodiments of the invention, methods are provided that facilitate the use of multiple sample preparation steps in parallel, coupled with multiple analytical processes following sequence detection. Thus, in some embodiments of the invention, an improved workflow is provided that reduces error and uncertainty when simultaneously assaying different types of genetic lesions across multiple loci in multiple patients.

In some embodiments, aspects of the invention provide methods for overcoming preparative and/or analytical bias by combining two or more techniques, each having a different bias (e.g., a known bias towards under-representation or over-representation of one or more types of sequences), and using the resulting data to determine a genetic call for a subject with greater confidence.

It should be appreciated that in some embodiments, aspects of the invention relate to multiplex diagnostic methods. In some embodiments, multiplex diagnostic methods comprise capturing a plurality of genetic loci in parallel (e.g., one or more genetic loci from Table 1). In some embodiments, the genetic loci possess one or more polymorphisms (e.g., one or more polymorphisms from Table 2) the genotypes of which correspond to disease causing alleles. Accordingly, in some embodiments, the disclosure provides methods for assessing multiple heritable disorders in parallel. In some embodiments, methods are provided for diagnosing multiple heritable disorders in parallel at a pre-implantation, prenatal, perinatal, or postnatal stage. In some embodiments, the disclosure provides methods for analyzing multiple genetic loci (e.g., a plurality of target nucleic acids selected from Table 1) from a patient sample, such as a blood, pre-implantation embryo, chorionic villus or amniotic fluid sample, or other sample (e.g., other biological fluid or tissue sample such as a biopsy sample) as aspects of the invention are not limited in this respect.

Other samples may include tumor tissue or circulating tumor cells. In some embodiments, a patient sample (e.g., a tumor tissue or cell sample) is mosaic for one or more mutations of interest, and thus, may require higher sensitivity than is needed for a germline mutation analysis. In some embodiments, a sample comprises cells from a non-host organism (e.g., bacterial or viral infections in a human subject) or a sample for environmental monitoring (e.g., bacterial, viral, fungal composition of a soil, water, or air sample).

Accordingly, in some embodiments, aspects of the methods disclosed herein relate to genotyping a polymorphism of a target nucleic acid. In some embodiments, the genotyping may comprise determining that one or more alleles of the target nucleic acid are heterozygous or homozygous. In further embodiments, the genotyping may comprise determining the sequence of a polymorphism and comparing that sequence to a control sequence that is indicative of a disease risk. In some embodiments, the polymorphism is selected from a locus in Table 1 or Table 2. However, it should be appreciated that any locus associated with a disease or condition of interest may be used.

In some embodiments, a diagnosis, prognosis, or disease risk assessment is provided to a subject based on a genotype determined for that subject at one or more genetic loci (e.g., based on the analysis of a biological sample obtained from that subject). In some embodiments, an assessment is provided to a couple, based on their respective genotypes at one or more genetic loci, of the risk of their having one or more children having a genotype associated with a disease or condition (e.g., a homozygous or heterozygous genotype associated with a disease or condition). In some embodiments, a subject or a couple may seek genetic or reproductive counseling in connection with a genotype determined according to embodiments of the invention. In some embodiments, genetic information from a tumor or circulating tumor cells is used to determine prognosis and guide selection of appropriate drugs/treatments.

It should be appreciated that any of the methods or compositions described herein may be used in combination with any of the medical evaluations associated with one or more genetic loci as described herein.

In some embodiments, aspects of the invention provide effective methods for overcoming challenges associated with systematic errors (bias) and/or stochastic effects in multiplex genomic capture and/or analysis (including sequencing analysis). In some embodiments, aspects of the invention are useful to avoid, reduce and/or account for variability in one or more sampling and/or analytical steps. For example, in some embodiments, variability in target nucleic acid representation and unequal sampling of heterozygous alleles in pools of captured target nucleic acids can be overcome.

Accordingly, in some embodiments, the disclosure provides methods that reduce variability in the detection of target nucleic acids in multiplex capture methods. In other embodiments, methods improve allelic representation in a capture pool and, thus, improve variant detection outcomes. In certain embodiments, the disclosure provides preparative methods for capturing target nucleic acids (e.g., genetic loci) that involve the use of different sets of multiple probes (e.g., molecular inversion probes MIPs) that capture overlapping regions of a target nucleic acid to achieve a more uniform representation of the target nucleic acids in a capture pool compared with methods of the prior art. In other embodiments, methods reduce bias, or the risk of bias, associated with large scale parallel capture of genetic loci, e.g., for diagnostic purposes. In other embodiments, methods are provided for increasing reproducibility (e.g., by reducing the effect of polymorphisms on target nucleic acid capture) in the detection of a plurality of genetic loci in parallel. In further embodiments, methods are provided for reducing the effect of probe synthesis and/or probe amplification variability on the analysis of a plurality of genetic loci in parallel.

According to some aspects, methods of analyzing a plurality of genetic loci are provided. In some embodiments, the methods comprise contacting each of a plurality of target nucleic acids with a probe set, wherein each probe set comprises a plurality of different probes, each probe having a central region flanked by a 5′ region and a 3′ region that are complementary to nucleic acids flanking the same strand of one of a plurality of subregions of the target nucleic acid, wherein the subregions of the target nucleic acid are different, and wherein each subregion overlaps with at least one other subregion, isolating a plurality of nucleic acids each having a nucleic acid sequence of a different subregion for each of the plurality of target nucleic acids, and analyzing the isolated nucleic acids.

In other embodiments, methods comprise contacting each of a plurality of target nucleic acids with a probe set, wherein each probe set comprises a plurality of different probes, each probe having a central region flanked by a 5′ region and a 3′ region that are complementary to nucleic acids flanking the same strand of one of a plurality of subregions of the target nucleic acid, wherein the subregions of the target nucleic acid are different, and wherein a portion of the 5′ region and a portion of the 3′ region of a probe have, respectively, the sequence of the 5′ region and the sequence of the 3′ region of a different probe, isolating a plurality of nucleic acids each having a nucleic acid sequence of a different subregion for each of the plurality of target nucleic acids, and analyzing the isolated nucleic acids.

Aspects of the disclosure are based, in part, on the discovery of methods for overcoming problems associated with systematic and random errors (bias) in genome capture, amplification and sequencing methods, namely high variability in the capture and amplification of nucleic acids and disproportionate representation of heterozygous alleles in sequencing libraries. Accordingly, in some embodiments, the disclosure provides methods that reduce errors associated with the variability in the capture and amplification of nucleic acids. In other embodiments, the methods improve allelic representation in sequencing libraries and, thus, improve variant detection outcomes. In certain embodiments, the disclosure provides preparative methods for capturing target nucleic acids (e.g., genetic loci) that involve the use of differentiator tag sequences to uniquely tag individual nucleic acid molecules. In some embodiments, the differentiator tag sequence permit the detection of bias based on the occurrence of combinations of differentiator tag and target sequences observed in a sequencing reaction. In other embodiments, the methods reduce errors caused by bias, or the risk of bias, associated with the capture, amplification and sequencing of genetic loci, e.g., for diagnostic purposes.

Aspects of the invention relate to providing sequence tags (referred to as differentiator tags) that are useful to determine whether target nucleic acid sequences identified in an assay are from independently isolated target nucleic acids or from multiple copies of the same target nucleic acid molecule (e.g., due to bias in a preparative step, for example, amplification). This information can be used to help analyze a threshold number of independently isolated target nucleic acids from a biological sample in order to obtain sequence information that is reliable and can be used to make a genotype conclusion (e.g., call) with a desired degree of confidence. This information also can be used to detect bias in one or more nucleic acid preparative steps.

In some embodiments, the methods disclosed herein are useful for any application where reduction of bias, e.g., associated with genomic isolation, amplification, sequencing, is important. For example, detection of cancer mutations in a heterogeneous tissue sample, detection of mutations in maternally-circulating fetal DNA, and detection of mutations in cells isolated during a preimplantation genetic diagnostic procedure.

Accordingly, in some aspects, methods of genotyping a subject are provided. In some embodiments, the methods comprise determining the sequence of at least a threshold number of independently isolated nucleic acids, wherein the sequence of each isolated nucleic acid comprises a target nucleic acid sequence and a differentiator tag sequence, wherein the threshold number is a number of unique combinations of target nucleic acid and differentiator tag sequences, wherein the isolated nucleic acids are identified as independently isolated if they comprise unique combinations of target nucleic acid and differentiator tag sequences, and wherein the target nucleic acid sequence is the sequence of a genomic locus of a subject.

In some embodiments, the isolated nucleic acids are products of a circularization selection-based preparative method, e.g., molecular inversion probe capture products. In other embodiments, the isolated nucleic acids are products of an amplification-based preparative methods. In other embodiments, the isolated nucleic acids are products of hybridization-based preparative methods.

Circularization selection-based preparative methods selectively convert regions of interest (target nucleic acids) into a covalently-closed circular molecule which is then isolated typically by removal (usually enzymatic, e.g. with exonuclease) of any non-circularized linear nucleic acid. Oligonucleotide probes (e.g., molecular inversion probes) are designed which have ends that flank the region of interest (target nucleic acid) and, optionally, primer sites, e.g., sequencing primer sites. The probes are allowed to hybridize to the genomic target, and enzymes are used to first (optionally) fill in any gap between probe ends and second ligate the probe closed. Following circularization, any remaining (non-target) linear nucleic acid is typically removed, resulting in isolation (capture) of target nucleic acid. Circularization selection-based preparative methods include molecular inversion probe capture reactions and ‘selector’ capture reactions. In some embodiments, molecular inversion probe capture of a target nucleic acid is indicative of the presence of a polymorphism in the target nucleic acid.

In amplification-based (e.g., PCR-based or LCR-based, etc.) preparative methods, genomic loci (target nucleic acids) are isolated directly by means of a polymerase chain reaction or ligase chain reaction (or other amplification method) that selectively amplifies each locus using one or more oligonucleotide primers. It is to be understood that primers will be sufficiently complementary to the target sequence to hybridize with and prime amplification of the target nucleic acid. Any one of a variety of art known methods may be utilized for primer design and synthesis. One or more of the primers may be perfectly complementary to the target sequence. Degenerate primers may also be used. Primers may also include additional nucleic acids that are not complementary to target sequences but that facilitate downstream applications, including for example restriction sites and differentiator tag sequences. Amplification-based methods include amplification of a single target nucleic acid and multiplex amplification (amplification of multiple target nucleic acids in parallel).

Hybridization-based preparative methods involve selectively immobilizing target nucleic acids for further manipulation. It is to be understood that one or more oligonucleotides (immobilization oligonucleotides), which comprise differentiator tag sequences, and which may be from 15 to 170 nucleotides in length, are used which hybridize along the length of a target region of a genetic locus to immobilize it. In some embodiments, immobilization oligonucleotides, are either immobilized before hybridization is performed (e.g., Roche/Nimblegen ‘sequence capture’), or are prepared such that they include a moiety (e.g. biotin) which can be used to selectively immobilize the target nucleic acid after hybridization by binding to e.g., streptavidin-coated microbeads (e.g. Agilent ‘SureSelect’).

It should be appreciated that any of the circularization, amplification, and/or hybridization based methods described herein may be used in connection with one or more of the tiling/staggering, tagging, size-detection, and/or sensitivity enhancing algorithms described herein.

In some embodiments, the methods disclosed herein comprise determining the sequence of molecular inversion probe capture products, each comprising a molecular inversion probe and a target nucleic acid, wherein the sequence of the molecular inversion probe comprises a differentiator tag sequence and, optionally, a primer sequence, and wherein the target nucleic acid is a captured genomic locus of a subject, and genotyping the subject at the captured genomic locus based on the sequence of at least a threshold number of unique combinations of target nucleic acid and differentiator tag sequences of molecular inversion probe capture products.

In some embodiments, the methods disclosed herein comprise obtaining molecular inversion probe capture products, each comprising a molecular inversion probe and a target nucleic acid, wherein the sequence of the molecular inversion probe comprises a differentiator tag sequence and, optionally, a primer sequence, wherein the target nucleic acid is a captured genomic locus of the subject, amplifying the molecular inversion probe capture products, and genotyping the subject by determining, for each target nucleic acid, the sequence of at least a threshold number of unique combinations of target nucleic acid and differentiator tag sequence of molecular inversion probe capture products. In certain embodiments, obtaining comprises capturing target nucleic acids from a genomic sample of the subject with molecular inversion probes, each comprising a unique differentiator tag sequence. In specific embodiments, capturing is performed under conditions wherein the likelihood of obtaining two or more molecular inversion probe capture products with identical combinations of target and differentiator tag sequences is equal to or less than a predetermined value, optionally wherein the predetermined value is about 0.05.

In one embodiment, the threshold number for a specific target nucleic acid sequence is selected based on a desired statistical confidence for the genotype. In some embodiments, the methods further comprising determining a statistical confidence for the genotype based on the number of unique combinations of target nucleic acid and differentiator tag sequences.

According to some aspects, methods of analyzing a plurality of genetic loci are provided. In some embodiments, the methods comprise obtaining a plurality of molecular inversion probe capture products each comprising a molecular inversion probe and a target nucleic acid, wherein the sequence of the molecular inversion probe comprises a differentiator tag sequence and, optionally, a primer sequence (e.g., a sequence that is complementary to the sequence of a nucleic acid that is used as a primer for sequencing or other extension reaction), amplifying the plurality of molecular inversion probe capture products, determining numbers of occurrence of combinations of target nucleic acid and differentiator tag sequence of molecular inversion probe capture products in the amplified plurality, and if the number of occurrence of a specific combination of target nucleic acid sequence and differentiator tag sequence exceeds a predetermined value, detecting bias in the amplification of the molecular inversion probe comprising the specific combination. In some embodiments, the methods further comprise genotyping target sequences in the plurality, wherein the genotyping comprises correcting for bias, if detected.

In some embodiments, the target nucleic acid is a gene (or portion thereof) selected from Table 1. In some embodiments, the genotyping comprises determining the sequence of a target nucleic acid (e.g., a polymorphic sequence) at one or more (both) alleles of a genome (a diploid genome) of a subject. In certain embodiments, the genotyping comprises determining the sequence of a target nucleic acid at both alleles of a diploid genome of a subject, wherein in the target nucleic acid comprises, or consists of, a sequence of Table 1, Table 2, or other locus of interest.

In some embodiments, aspects of the invention provide methods and compositions for identifying nucleic acid insertions or deletions in genomic regions of interest without determining the nucleotide sequences of these regions. Aspects of the invention are particularly useful for detecting nucleic acid insertions or deletions in genomic regions containing nucleic acid sequence repeats (e.g., di- or tri-nucleotide repeats). However, the invention is not limited to analyzing nucleic acid repeats and may be used to detect insertions or deletions in any target nucleic acid of interest. Aspects of the invention are particularly useful for analyzing multiple loci in a multiplex assay.

In some embodiments, aspects of the invention relate to determining whether an amount of target nucleic acid that is captured in a genomic capture assay is higher or lower than expected. In some embodiments, a statistically significant deviation from an expected amount (e.g., higher or lower) is indicative of the presence of a nucleic acid insertion or deletion in the genomic region of interest. In some embodiments, the amount is a number of nucleic acid molecules that are captured. In some embodiments, the amount is a number of independently captured nucleic acid molecules in a sample. It should be appreciated that the captured nucleic acids may be literally captured from a sample, or their sequences may be captured without actually capturing the original nucleic acids in the sample. For example, nucleic acid sequences may be captured in an assay that involves a template-based extension of nucleic acids having the region of interest, in the sample.

Aspects of the invention are based on the recognition that the efficiency of certain capture techniques is affected by the length of the nucleic acid being captured.

Accordingly, an increase or decrease in the length of a target nucleic acid (e.g., due to an insertion or deletion of a repeated sequence) can alter the capture efficiency of that nucleic acid. In some embodiments, a difference in the capture efficiency (e.g., a statistically significant difference in the capture efficiency) of a target nucleic acid is indicative of an insertion or deletion in the target nucleic acid. It should be appreciated that the capture efficiency for a target nucleic acid may be evaluated based on an amount of captured nucleic acid (e.g., number of captured nucleic acid molecules) relative to a control amount (e.g., based on an amount of control nucleic acid that is captured). However, the invention is not limited in this respect and other techniques for evaluating capture efficiency also may be used.

According to aspects of the invention, evaluating the capture efficiency as opposed to determining the sequence of the entire repeat region reduces errors associated with sequencing through repeat regions. Repeat sequences often give rise to stutters or skips in sequencing reactions that make it very difficult to accurately determine the number of repeats in a target region without running multiple sequencing reactions under different conditions and carefully analyzing the results. Such procedures are cumbersome and not readily scalable in a manner that is consistent with high throughput analyses of target nucleic acids. In some embodiments, repeat regions may be longer than the length of the individual sequence read, making length determination on the basis of a single read impossible. For example, when using next-generation sequencing the repeat regions may be longer than the length of the individual sequence read, making length determination on the basis of a single read impossible. Accordingly, aspects of the invention are useful to increase the sensitivity of detecting insertions or deletions in target regions, particularly target regions containing repeated sequences.

In some embodiments, aspects of the invention relate to capturing genomic nucleic acid sequences using a molecular inversion probe (e.g., MIP or Padlock probe) technique, and determining whether the amount (e.g., number) of captured sequences is higher or lower than expected. In some embodiments, the amount (e.g., number) of captured sequences is compared to an amount (e.g., number) of sequences captured in a control assay. The control assay may involve analyzing a control sample that contains a nucleic acid from the same genetic locus having a known sequence length (e.g., a known number of nucleic acid repeats). However, a control may involve analyzing a second (e.g., different) genetic locus that is not expected to contain any insertions or deletions. The second genetic locus may be analyzed in the same sample as the locus being interrogated or in a different sample where its length has been previously determined. The second genetic locus may be a locus that is not characterized by the presence of nucleic acid repeats (and thus not expected to contain insertions or deletions of the repeat sequence).

In some embodiments, a target nucleic acid region that is being evaluated may be determined by the identity of the targeting arms of a probe that is designed to capture the target region (or sequence thereof). For example, the targeting arms of a MIP probe may be designed to be complementary (e.g., sufficiently complementary for selective hybridization and//or polymerase extension and/or ligation) to genomic regions flanking a target region suspected of containing an insertion or deletion. It should be appreciated that two targeting arms may be designed to be complementary (e.g., sufficiently complementary for selective hybridization and/or polymerase extension and/or ligation) to the two flanking regions that are immediately adjacent (e.g., immediately 5′ and 3′, respectively) to a region of a sequence repeat on one strand of a genomic nucleic acid. However, one or both targeting arms may be designed to hybridize several bases (e.g., 1-5, 5-10, 10-25, 25-50, or more) upstream or downstream from the repeat region in such a way that the captured sequence includes a region of unique genomic sequence that on one or both sides of the repeat region. This unique region can then be used to identify the captured target (e.g., based on sequence or hybridization information).

In some embodiments, two or more (e.g., 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 or more) different loci may be interrogated in parallel in a single assay (e.g., in a multiplex assay). In some embodiments, the ratio of captured nucleic acids for each locus may be used to determine whether a nucleic acid insertion or deletion is present in one locus relative to the other. For example, the ratio may be compared to a control ratio that is representative of the two loci when neither one has an insertion or deletion relative to control sequences (e.g., sequences that are normal or known to be associated with healthy phenotypes for those loci). However, the amount of captured nucleic acids may be compared to any suitable control as discussed herein.

The locus of a captured sequence may be identified by determining a portion of unique sequence 5′ and/or 3′ to the repeat region in the target nucleic acid suspected of containing a deletion or insertion. This does not require sequencing the captured repeat region itself. However, some or all of the repeat region also could be sequenced as aspects of the invention are not limited in this respect.

Aspects of the invention may be combined with one or more sequence-based assays (e.g., SNP detection assays), for example in a multiplex format, to determine the genotype of one or more regions of a subject.

In some embodiments, methods of detecting a polymorphism in a nucleic acid in a biological sample are provided. In some embodiments, the methods comprise evaluating the efficiency of capture at one or more loci and determining whether one or both alleles at that locus contain an insertion or deletion relative to a control locus (e.g., a locus indicative of a length of repeat sequence that is associated with a healthy phenotype).

Accordingly, aspects of the invention relate to methods for determining whether a target nucleic acid has an abnormal length by evaluating the capture efficiency of a target nucleic acid in a biological sample from a subject, wherein a capture efficiency that is different from a reference capture efficiency is indicative of the presence, in the biological sample, of a target nucleic acid having an abnormal length. It should be appreciated that the term “abnormal” is a relative term based on a comparison to a “normal” length. In some embodiments, a normal length is a length that is associated with a normal (e.g., healthy or non-carrier phenotype). Accordingly, an abnormal length is a length that is either shorter or longer than the normal length. In some embodiments, the presence of an abnormal length is indicative of an increased risk that the locus is associated with a disease or a disease carrier phenotype. In some embodiments, the abnormal length is indicative that the subject is either has a disease or condition or is a carrier of a disease or condition (e.g., associated with the locus). However, it should be appreciated that the description of embodiments relating to detecting the presence of an abnormal length also support detecting the presence of a length that is different from an expected or control length.

In some embodiments, aspects of the invention relate to estimating the length of a target nucleic acid (e.g., of a sub-target region within a target nucleic acid). In some embodiments, aspects of the invention relate to methods for estimating the length of a target nucleic acid by contacting the target nucleic acid with a plurality of detection probes under conditions that permit hybridization of the detection probes to the target nucleic acid, wherein each detection probe is a polynucleotide that comprises a first arm that hybridizes to a first region of the target nucleic acid and a second arm that hybridizes to a second region of the target nucleic acid, wherein the first and second regions are on a common strand of the target nucleic acid, and wherein the nucleotide sequence of the target between the 5′ end of the first region and the 3′ end of the second region is the nucleotide sequence of a sub-target nucleic acid; and capturing a plurality of sub-target nucleic acids that are hybridized with the plurality of detection probes; and measuring the frequency of occurrence of a sub-target nucleic acid in the plurality of sub-target nucleic acids, wherein the frequency of occurrence of the sub-target nucleic acid in the plurality of sub-target nucleic acids is indicative of the length of the sub-target nucleic acid. It should be appreciated that methods for estimating a nucleic acid length may involve comparing a capture efficiency for a target nucleic acid region to two or more reference efficiencies for known nucleic acid lengths in order to determine whether the target nucleic acid region is smaller, intermediate, or larger in size than the known control lengths. In some embodiments, a series of nucleic acids of known different lengths may be used to provide a calibration curve for evaluating the length of a target nucleic acid region of interest.

In some embodiments, the capture efficiency of a target region suspected of having a deletion or insertion is determined by comparing the capture efficiency to a reference indicative of a normal capture efficiency. In some embodiments, the capture efficiency is lower than the reference capture efficiency. In some embodiments, the subject is identified as having an insertion in the target region. In some embodiments, the capture efficiency is higher than the reference capture efficiency. In some embodiments, the subject is identified as having a deletion in the target region. In some embodiments, the subject is identified as being heterozygous for the insertion. In some embodiments, the subject is identified as being heterozygous for the deletion.

In some embodiments of any of the methods described herein (e.g., tiling/staggering, tagging, size-detection, and/or sensitivity enhancement) aspects of the invention relate to capturing a sub-target nucleic acid (or a sequence of a sub-target nucleic acid). In some embodiments, a molecular inversion probe technique is used. In some embodiments, a molecular inversion probe is a single linear strand of nucleic acid that comprises a first targeting arm at its 5′ end and a second targeting arm at its 3′ end, wherein the first targeting arm is capable of specifically hybridizing to a first region flanking one end of the sub-target nucleic acid, and wherein the second targeting arm is capable of specifically hybridizing to a second region flanking the other end of the sub target nucleic acid on the same strand of the target nucleic acid. In some embodiments, the first and second targeting arms are between about 10 and about 100 nucleotides long. In some embodiments, the first and second targeting arms are about 10-20, 20-30, 30-40, or 40-50 nucleotides long. In some embodiments, the first and second targeting arms are about 20 nucleotides long. In some embodiments, the first and second targeting arms have the same length. In some embodiments, the first and second targeting arms have different lengths. In some embodiments, each pair of first and second targeting arms in a set of probes has the same length. Accordingly, if one of the targeting arms is longer, the other one is correspondingly shorter. This allows for a quality control step in some embodiments to confirm that all captured probe/target sequence products have the same length after a multiplexed plurality of capture reactions. In some embodiments, a set of probes may be designed to have the same length if the intervening region is varied to accommodate any differences in the length of either one or both of the first and second targeting arms.

In some embodiments, the hybridization Tms of the first and second targeting arms are similar. In some embodiments, the hybridization Tms of the first and second targeting arms are within 2-5° C. of each other. In some embodiments, the hybridization Tms of the first and second targeting arms are identical. In some embodiments, the hybridization Tms of the first and second targeting arms are close to empirically-determined optima but not necessarily identical.

In some embodiments, the first and second targeting arms of a molecular inversion probe have different Tms. For example, the Tm of the first targeting arm (at the 5′ end of the molecular inversion probe) may be higher than the Tm of the second targeting arm (at the 3′ end of the molecular inversion probe). According to aspects of the invention, and without wishing to be bound by theory, a relatively high Tm for the first targeting arm may help avoid or prevent the first targeting arm from being displaced after hybridization by the extension product of the 3′ end of the second targeting arm. It should be appreciated that a reference to the Tm of a targeting arm as used herein relates to the Tm of hybridization of the targeting arm to a nucleic acid having the complementary sequence (e.g., the region of the target nucleic acid that has a sequence that is complementary to the sequence of the targeting arm). It also should be appreciated that the Tms of the targeting arms described herein may be calculated using any appropriate method. For example, in some embodiments an experimental method (e.g., a gel shift assay, a hybridization assay, a melting curve analysis, for example in a PCR machine with a SYBR dye by stepping through a temperature ramp while monitoring signal level from an intercalating dye, for example, bound to a double-stranded DNA, etc.) may be used to determine one or more Tms empirically. In some embodiments, an optimal Tm may be determined by evaluating the number of products formed (e.g., for each of a plurality of MIP probes), and determining the optimal Tm as the center point in a histogram of Tm for all targeting arms. In some embodiments, a predictive algorithm may be used to determine a Tm theoretically. In some embodiments, a relatively simple predictive algorithm may be used based on the number of G/C and A/T base pairs when the sequence is hybridized to its target and/or the length of the hybridized product (e.g., for example, 64.9+41*([G+C]−16.4)/(A+T+G+C), see for example, Wallace, R. B., Shaffer, J., Murphy, R. F., Bonner, J., Hirose, T., and Itakura, K. (1979) Nucleic Acids Res 6:3543-3557). In some embodiments, a more complex algorithm may be used to account for the effects of base stacking entropy and enthalpy, ion concentration, and primer concentration (see, for example, SantaLucia J (1998), Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 95:1460-5). In some embodiments an algorithm may use modified parameters (e.g., nearest-neighbor parameters for basepair entropy/enthalpy values). It should be appreciated that any suitable algorithm may be used as aspects of the invention are not limited in this respect. However, it also should be appreciated that different methodologies may results in different calculated or predicted Tms for the same sequences. Accordingly, in some embodiments, the same empirical and/or theoretical method is used to determine the Tms of different sequences for a set of probes to avoid a negative impact of any systematic difference in the Tm determination or prediction when designing a set of probes with predetermined similarities or differences for different Tms.

In some embodiments, the Tm of the first targeting arm may be about 1° C., about 2° C., about 3° C., about 4° C., about 5° C., or more than about 5° C. higher than the Tm of the second targeting arm. In some embodiments, each probe in a plurality of probes (e.g., each probe in a set of 5-10, each probe in a set of at least 10, each probe in a set of 10-50, each probe in a set of 50-100, each probe in a set of 100-500, each probe in a set of 500-1,000, each probe in a set of 1,000-1,500, each probe in a set of 1,500-2,000, each probe in a set of 2,000-3,000, 3,000-5,000, 5,000-10,000 or each probe in a set of at least 5,000 different probes) has a unique first targeting arm (e.g., they all have different sequences) and a unique second targeting arm (e.g., they all have different sequences). In some embodiments, for at least 10% of the probes (e.g., at least 25%, 25%-50%, 50%-75%, 75%-90%, 90%-95% or over 95%, or all of the probes) the first targeting arm has a Tm for its complementary sequence that is higher (e.g., about 1° C., about 2° C., about 3° C., about 4° C., about 5° C., or more than about 5° C. higher) than the Tm of the second targeting arm for its complementary sequence. In some embodiments, each of the first targeting arms have similar or identical Tms for their respective complementary sequences and each of the second targeting arms have similar or identical Tms for their respective complementary sequences (and the first targeting arms have higher Tms than the second targeting arms). For example, in some embodiments, the Tm of the first arm(s) may be about 58° C. and the Tm of the second arm(s) may be about 56° C. In some embodiments, the Tm of the first arm(s) may be about 68° C., and the Tm of the second arm(s) may be about 65° C. It should be appreciated that in some embodiments the similarity (e.g., within a range of 1° C., 2° C., 3° C., 4° C., 5° C.) or identity of the Tms for the different targeting arms should be based either on empirical data for each arm or based on the same predictive algorithm for each arm (e.g., Wallace, R. B., Shaffer, J., Murphy, R. F., Bonner, J., Hirose, T., and Itakura, K. (1979) Nucleic Acids Res 6:3543-3557, SantaLucia J (1998), Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 95:1460-5, or other algorithm).

In some embodiments, the Tm of the first targeting arm of a molecular inversion probe (at the 5′ end of the molecular inversion probe) is selected to be sufficiently stable to prevent displacement of the first targeting arm from its complementary sequence on a target nucleic acid. In some embodiments, the Tm of the first targeting arm is 50-55° C., at least 55° C., 55-60° C., at least 60° C., 60-65° C., at least 65° C., at least 70° C., at least 75° C., or at least 80° C. As discussed above, it should be appreciated that the for a particular targeting arm may be determined empirically or theoretically. Different theoretical models may be used to determine a Tm and it should be appreciated that the predicted Tm for a particular sequence may be different depending on the algorithm used for the prediction. In some embodiments, each probe in a plurality of probes (e.g., each probe in a set of 5-10, each probe in a set of at least 10, each probe in a set of 10-50, each probe in a set of 50-100, each probe in a set of 100-500, or each probe in a set of at least 500 different probes) has a different first targeting arm (e.g., different sequences) but each different first targeting arm has a similar or identical Tm for its complementary sequence on a target nucleic acid. It should be appreciated that in some embodiments the similarity (e.g., within a range of I C, 2 C, 3 C, 4 C, 5 C) or identity of the Tms for the different targeting arms should be based either on empirical data for each arm or based on the same predictive algorithm for each arm (e.g., Wallace, R. B., Shaffer, J., Murphy, R. F., Bonner, J., Hirose, T., and Itakura, K. (1979) Nucleic Acids Res 6:3543-3557, SantaLucia J (1998), Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 95:1460-5, or other algorithm).

In some embodiments, the sub-target nucleic acid contains a nucleic acid repeat. In some embodiments, the nucleic acid repeat is a dinucleotide or trinucleotide repeat. In some embodiments, the sub-target nucleic acid contains 10-100 copies of the nucleic acid repeat in the absence of an abnormal increase or decrease in nucleic acid repeats. In some embodiments, the sub-target nucleic acid is a region of the Fragile-X locus that contains a nucleic acid repeat. In some embodiments, one or both targeting arms hybridize to a region on the target nucleic acid that is immediately adjacent to a region of nucleic acid repeats. In some embodiments, one or both targeting arms hybridize to a region on the target nucleic acid that is separated from a region of nucleic acid repeats by a region that does not contain any nucleic acid repeats. In some embodiments, the molecular inversion probe further comprises a primer-binding region that can be used to sequence the captured sub-target nucleic acid and optionally the first and/or second targeting arm.

In some embodiments, aspects of the invention relate to evaluating the length of a plurality of different target nucleic acids in a biological sample. In some embodiments, the plurality of target nucleic acids are analyzed using a plurality of different molecular inversion probes. In some embodiments, each different molecular inversion probe comprises a different pair of first and second targeting arms at each of the 3′ and 5′ ends. In some embodiments, each different molecular inversion probe comprises the same primer-binding sequence.

In some embodiments, aspects of the invention relate to analyzing nucleic acid from a biological sample obtained from a subject. In some embodiments, the biological sample is a blood sample. In some embodiments, the biological sample is a tissue sample, specific cell population, tumor sample, circulating tumor cells, or environmental sample. In some embodiments, the biological sample is a single cell. In some embodiments, nucleic acids are analyzed in biological samples obtained from a plurality of different subjects. In some embodiments, nucleic acids from a biological sample are analyzed in multiplex reactions. It should be appreciated that a biological sample contains a plurality of copies of a genome derived from a plurality of cells in the sample. Accordingly, a sample may contain a plurality of independent copies of a target nucleic acid region of interest, the capture efficiency of which can be used to evaluate its size as described herein.

In some embodiments, aspects of the invention relate to evaluating a nucleic acid capture efficiency by determining an amount of target nucleic acid that is captured (e.g., an amount of sub-target nucleic acid sequences that are captured). In some embodiments, the amount of target nucleic acid that is captured is determined by determining a number of independently captured target nucleic acid molecules (e.g., the amount of independently captured molecules that have the sequence of the sub-target region). In some embodiments, the amount of target nucleic acid that is captured is compared to a reference amount of captured nucleic acid. In some embodiments, the reference amount is determined by determining a number of independently captured molecules of a reference nucleic acid. In some embodiments, the reference nucleic acid is a nucleic acid of a different locus in the biological sample that is not suspected of containing a deletion or insertion. In some embodiments, the reference nucleic acid is a nucleic acid of known size and amount that is added to the capture reaction. As described herein, a number of independently captured nucleic acid sequences can be determined by contacting a nucleic acid sample with a preparation of a probe (e.g., a MIP probe as described herein). It should be appreciated that the preparation may comprise a plurality of copies of the same probe and accordingly a plurality of independent copies of the target region may be captured by different probe molecules. The number of probe molecules that actually capture a sequence can be evaluated by determining an amount or number of captured molecules using any suitable technique. This number is a reflection of both the number of target molecules in the sample and the efficiency of capture of those target molecules, which in turn is related to the size of the target molecules as described herein. Accordingly, the capture efficiency can be evaluated by controlling for the abundance of the target nucleic acid, for example by comparing the number or amount of captured target molecules to an appropriate control (e.g., a known size and amount of control nucleic acid, or a different locus that should be present in the same amount in the biological sample and is not expected to contain any insertions or deletions). It should be appreciated that other factors may affect the capture efficiency of a particular target nucleic acid region (e.g., the sequence of the region, the GC content, the presence of secondary structures, etc.). However, these factors also can be accounted for by using appropriate controls (e.g., known sequences having similar properties, the same sequences, other genomic sequences expected to be present in the biological sample at the same frequency, etc., or any combination thereof).

In some embodiments, aspects of the invention relate to identifying a subject as having an insertion or deletion in one or more alleles of a genetic locus if the capture efficiency for that genetic locus is statistically significantly different than a reference capture efficiency.

It should be appreciated that hybridization conditions used for any of the capture techniques described herein (e.g., MIP capture techniques) can be based on known hybridization buffers and conditions.

In some embodiments, the methods disclosed herein are useful for any application where the detection of deletions or insertions is important.

In some embodiments, aspects of the invention relate to basing a nucleic acid sequence analysis on results from two or more different nucleic acid preparatory techniques that have different systematic biases in the types of nucleic acids that they sample. According to the invention, different techniques have different sequence biases that are systematic and not simply due to stochastic effects during nucleic acid capture or amplification. Accordingly, the degree of oversampling required to overcome variations in nucleic acid preparation needs to be sufficient to overcome the biases (e.g., an oversampling of 2-5 fold, 5-10 fold, 5-15 fold, 15-20 fold, 20-30 fold, 30-50 fold, or intermediate to higher fold).

According to some embodiments, different techniques have different characteristic or systematic biases. For example, one technique may bias a sample analysis towards one particular allele at a genetic locus of interest, whereas a different technique would bias the sample analysis towards a different allele at the same locus. Accordingly, the same sample may be identified as being different depending on the type of technique that is used to prepare nucleic acid for sequence analysis. This effectively represents a sensitivity limitation, because each technique has different relative sensitivities for polymorphic sequences of interest.

According to aspects of the invention, the sensitivity of a nucleic acid analysis can be increased by combining the sequences from different nucleic acid preparative steps and using the combined sequence information for a diagnostic assay (e.g., for a making a call as to whether a subject is homozygous or heterozygous at a genetic locus of interest).

In some embodiments, the invention provides a method of increasing the sensitivity of a nucleic acid detection assay by obtaining a first preparation of a target nucleic acid using a first preparative method on a biological sample, obtaining a second preparation of a target nucleic acid using a second preparative method on the biological sample, assaying the sequences obtained in both first and second nucleic acid preparations, and using the sequence information from both first and second nucleic acid preparations to determine the genotype of the target nucleic acid in the biological sample, wherein the first and second preparative methods have different systematic sequence biases. In some embodiments, the first and second nucleic acid preparations are combined prior to performing a sequence assay. In some embodiments, separate sequence assays are performed on the first and second nucleic acid preparations and the sequence information from both assays are combined to determine the genotype of the target nucleic acid in the biological sample. In some embodiments, the first preparative method is an amplification-based, a hybridization-based, or a circular probe-based preparative method. In some embodiments, the second method is an amplification-based, a hybridization-based, or a circular probe-based preparative method. In some embodiments, the first and second methods are of different types (e.g., only one of them is an amplification-based, a hybridization-based, or a circular probe-based preparative method, and the other one is one or the other two types of method). Accordingly, in some embodiments the second preparative method is an amplification-based, a hybridization-based, or a circular probe-based preparative method, provided that the second method is different from the first method. However, in some embodiments, both methods may be of the same type, provided they are different methods (e.g., both are amplification based or hybridization-based, but are different types of amplification or hybridization methods, e.g., with different relative biases).

In amplification-based (e.g., PCR-based or LCR-based, etc.) preparative methods, genomic loci (target nucleic acids) are isolated directly by means of a polymerase chain reaction or ligase chain reaction (or other amplification method) that selectively amplifies each locus using a pair of oligonucleotide primers. It is to be understood that primers will be sufficiently complementary to the target sequence to hybridize with and prime amplification of the target nucleic acid. Any one of a variety of art known methods may be utilized for primer design and synthesis. One or both of the primers may be perfectly complementary to the target sequence. Degenerate primers may also be used. Primers may also include additional nucleic acids that are not complementary to target sequences but that facilitate downstream applications, including for example restriction sites and identifier sequences (e.g., source sequences). PCR based methods may include amplification of a single target nucleic acid and multiplex amplification (amplification of multiple target nucleic acids in parallel).

Hybridization-based preparative may methods involve selectively immobilizing target nucleic acids for further manipulation. It is to be understood that one or more oligonucleotides (immobilization oligonucleotides), which in some embodiments may be from 10 to 200 nucleotides in length, are used which hybridize along the length of a target region of a genetic locus to immobilize it. In some embodiments, immobilization oligonucleotides are either immobilized before hybridization is performed (e.g., Roche/Nimblegen ‘sequence capture’), or are prepared such that they include a moiety (e.g., biotin) which can be used to selectively immobilize the target nucleic acid after hybridization by binding to e.g., streptavidin-coated microbeads (e.g., Agilent ‘SureSelect’).

Circularization selection-based preparative methods selectively convert each region of interest into a covalently-closed circular molecule which is then isolated by removal (usually enzymatic, e.g., with exonuclease) of any non-circularized linear nucleic acid. Oligonucleotide probes are designed which have ends that flank the region of interest. The probes are allowed to hybridize to the genomic target, and enzymes are used to first (optionally) fill in any gap between probe ends and second ligate the probe closed. In some embodiments, following circularization, any remaining (non-target) linear nucleic acid can be removed, resulting in isolation (capture) of target nucleic acid. Circularization selection-based preparative methods include molecular inversion probe capture reactions and ‘selector’ capture reactions. However, other techniques may be used as aspects of the invention are not limited in this respect. In some embodiments, molecular inversion probe capture of a target nucleic acid is indicative of the presence of a polymorphism in the target nucleic acid.

A variety of methods may be used to evaluate and compare bias profiles of each preparative technique. Next-generation sequencing may be used to quantitatively measure the abundance of each isolated target nucleic acid obtained from a certain preparative method. This abundance may be compared to a control abundance value (e.g., a known starting abundance of the target nucleic acid) and/or with an abundance determined through the use of an alternative preparative method. For example, a set of target nucleic acids may be isolated by one or more of the three preparative methods; the target nucleic acid may be observed x times using the amplification technique, y times using the hybridization enrichment technique, and z times using the circularization selection technique. A pairwise correlation coefficient may be computed between each abundance value (e.g., x and y, x and z, and y and z) to assess bias in nucleic acid isolation between pairs of preparative methods. Since the mechanisms of isolation are different in each approach, the abundances will usually be different and largely uncorrelated with each other.

In some embodiments, the invention provides a method of obtaining a nucleic acid preparation that is representative of a target nucleic acid in a biological sample by obtaining a first preparation of a target nucleic acid using a first preparative method on a biological sample, obtaining a second preparation of a target nucleic acid using a second preparative method on the biological sample, and combining the first and second nucleic acid preparations to obtain a combined preparation that is representative of the target nucleic acid in the biological sample.

In some embodiments of any of the methods described herein, a third preparation of the target nucleic acid is obtained using a third preparative method that is different from the first and second preparative methods, wherein the first, second, and third preparative methods all have different systematic sequence biases. In some embodiments of any of the methods described herein, the different preparative methods are used for a plurality of different loci in the biological sample to increase the sensitivity of a multiplex nucleic acid analysis. In some embodiments, the target nucleic acid has a sequence of a gene selected from Table 1.

However, it should be appreciated that a genotyping method of the invention may include several steps, each of which independently may involve one or more different preparative techniques described herein. In some embodiments, a nucleic acid preparation may be obtained using one or more (e.g., 2, 3, 4, 5, or more) different techniques described herein (e.g., amplification, hybridization capture, circular probe capture, etc., or any combination thereof) and the nucleic acid preparation may be analyzed using one or more different techniques (e.g., amplification, hybridization capture, circular probe capture, etc., or any combination thereof) that are selected independently of the techniques used for the initial preparation.

In some embodiments, aspects of the invention also provide compositions, kits, devices, and analytical methods for increasing the sensitivity of nucleic acid assays. Aspects of the invention are particularly useful for increasing the confidence level of genotyping analyses. However, aspects of the invention may be used in the context of any suitable nucleic acid analysis, for example, but not limited to, a nucleic acid analysis that is designed to determine whether more than one sequence variant is present in a sample.

In some embodiments, aspects of the invention relate to a plurality of nucleic acid probes (e.g., 10-50, 50-100, 100-250, 250-500, 500-1,000, 1,000-2,000, 2,000-5,000, 5,000-7,500, 7,500-10,000, or lower, higher, or intermediate number of different probes).

In some embodiments, each probe or each of a subset of probes (e.g., 10-25%, 25-50%, 50-75%, 75-90%, or 90-99%) has a different first targeting arm. In some embodiments, each probe or each probe of a subset of probes (e.g., 10-25%, 25-50%, 50-75%, 75-90%, or 90-99%) has a different second targeting arm. In some embodiments, the first and second targeting arms are separated by the same intervening sequence. In some embodiments, the first and second targeting arms are complementary to target nucleic acid sequences that are separated by the same or a similar length (e.g., number of nucleic acids, for example, 0-25, 25-50, 50-100, 100-250, 250-500, 500-1,000, 1,000-2,500 or longer or intermediate number of nucleotides) on their respective target nucleic acids (e.g., genomic loci). In some embodiments, each probe or a subset of probes (e.g., 10-30 25%, 25-50%, 50-75%, 75-90%, or 90-99%) includes a first primer binding sequence. In some embodiments, the primer binding sequence is the same (e.g., it can be used to prime sequencing or other extension reaction). In some embodiments, each probe or a subset of probes (e.g., 10-25%, 25-50%, 50-75%, 75-90%, or 90-99%) includes a unique identifier sequence tag (e.g., that is predetermined and can be used to distinguish each probe).

In some embodiments, the methods disclosed herein are useful for any application where sensitivity is important. For example, detection of cancer mutations in a heterogenous tissue sample, detection of mutations in maternally-circulating fetal DNA, and detection of mutations in cells isolated during a preimplantation genetic diagnostic procedure.

According to some aspects of the invention, methods of detecting a polymorphism in a nucleic acid in a biological sample are provided. In some embodiments, the methods comprise obtaining a nucleic acid preparation using a preparative method (e.g., any of the preparative methods disclosed herein) on a biological sample, and performing a molecular inversion probe capture reaction on the nucleic acid preparation, wherein a molecular inversion probe capture (e.g., using a mutation-detection MIP) of a target nucleic acid of the nucleic acid preparation is indicative of the presence of a mutation (polymorphism) in the target nucleic acid, optionally wherein the polymorphism is selected from Table 2.

According to some aspects of the invention, methods of genotyping a nucleic acid in a biological sample are provided. In some embodiments, the methods comprise obtaining a nucleic acid preparation using a preparative method on a biological sample, sequencing a target nucleic acid of the nucleic acid preparation, and performing a molecular inversion probe capture reaction on the biological sample, wherein a molecular inversion probe capture of the target nucleic acid in the biological sample is indicative of the presence of a polymorphism in the target nucleic acid, genotyping the target nucleic acid based on the results of the sequencing and the capture reaction.

In some embodiments of the methods disclosed herein, the target nucleic acid has a sequence of a gene selected from Table 1.

It should be appreciated that any one or more embodiments described herein may be used for evaluating multiple genetic markers in parallel. Accordingly, in some embodiments, aspects of the invention relate to determining the presence of one or more markers (e.g., one or more alleles) at multiple different genetic loci in parallel.

Accordingly, the risk or presence of multiple heritable disorders may be evaluated in parallel. In some embodiments, the risk of having offspring with one or more heritable disorders may be evaluated. In some embodiments, an evaluation may be performed on a biological sample of a parent or a child (e.g., at a pre-implantation, prenatal, perinatal, or postnatal stage).

In some embodiments, the disclosure provides methods for analyzing multiple genetic loci (e.g., a plurality of target nucleic acids selected from Table 1 or 2) from a patient sample, such as a blood, pre-implantation embryo, chorionic villus or amniotic fluid sample. A patient or subject may be a human. However, aspects of the invention are not limited to humans and may be applied to other species (e.g., mammals, birds, reptiles, other vertebrates or invertebrates) as aspects of the invention are not limited in this respect. A subject or patient may be male or female. In some embodiments, in connection with reproductive genetic counseling, samples from a male and female member of a couple may be analyzed. In some embodiments, for example, in connection with an animal breeding program, samples from a plurality of male and female subjects may be analyzed to determine compatible or optimal breeding partners or strategies for particular traits or to avoid one or more diseases or conditions. Accordingly, reproductive risks may be determined and/or reproductive recommendations may be provided based on information derived from one or more embodiments of the invention.

However, it should be appreciated that aspects of the invention may be used in connection with any medical evaluation where the presence of one or more alleles at a genetic locus of interest is relevant to a medical determination (e.g., risk or detection of disease, disease prognosis, therapy selection, therapy monitoring, etc.). Further aspects of the invention may be used in connection with detection, in tumor tissue or circulating tumor cells, of mutations in cellular pathways that cause cancer or predict efficacy of treatment regimens, or with detection and identification of pathogenic organisms in the environment or a sample obtained from a subject, e.g., a human subject.

These and other aspects of the invention are described in more detail in the following description and non-limiting examples and drawings.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 illustrates a non-limiting embodiment of a tiled probe layout;

FIG. 2 illustrates a non-limiting embodiment of a staggered probe layout;

FIG. 3 illustrates a non-limiting embodiment of an alternating staggered probe layout;

FIGS. 4A-C depict various non-limiting methods for combining differentiator tag sequence and target sequences (NNNN depicts a differentiator tag sequence);

FIG. 5 depicts a non-limiting method for genotyping based on target and 5 differentiator tag sequences;

FIG. 6 depicts non-limiting results of a simulation of a MIP capture reaction;

FIG. 7 depicts a non-limiting graph of sequencing coverage;

FIG. 8 illustrates that shorter sequences are captured with higher efficiency that longer sequences using MIPs;

FIG. 9 illustrates a non-limiting scheme of padlock (MIP) capture of a region that includes both repetitive regions (thick wavy line) and the adjacent unique sequence (thick strait line);

FIG. 10 illustrates a non-limiting hypothetical relationship between target gap size and the relative number of reads of the repetitive region;

FIG. 11A depicts MIP capture of FMR1 repeat regions from a diploid genome;

FIG. 11B depicts preparative methods for biallelic resolution of FMR I repeat region lengths in a diploid genome using MIP capture probes and unique differentiator tags;

FIG. 11C depicts an analysis of FMR1 repeat region lengths in a diploid genome;

FIG. 12 is a schematic of an embodiment of an algorithm of the invention;

FIG. 13 illustrates a non-limiting example of a graph of per-target abundance with MIP capture; and,

FIG. 14 shows a non-limiting a graph of correlation between two MIP capture reactions.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Aspects of the invention relate to preparative and analytical methods and compositions for evaluating genotypes, and in particular, for determining the allelic identity (or identities in a diploid organism) of one or more genetic loci in a subject.

Aspects of the invention are based, in part, on the identification of different sources of ambiguity and error in genetic analyses, and, in part, on the identification of one or more approaches to avoid, reduce, recognize, and/or resolve these errors and ambiguities at different stages in a genetic analysis. Aspects of the invention relate to methods and compositions for addressing bias and/or stochastic variation associated with one or more preparative and/or analytical steps of a nucleic acid evaluation technology. In some embodiments, preparative methods can be adapted to avoid or reduce the risk of bias skewing the results of a genetic analysis. In some embodiments, analytical methods can be adapted to recognize and correct for data variations that may give rise to misinterpretation (e.g., incorrect calls such as homozygous when the subject is actually heterozygous or heterozygous when the subject is actually homozygous). Methods of the invention may be used for any type of mutation, for example a single base change (e.g., insertion, deletion, transversion or transition, etc.), a multiple base insertion, deletion, duplication, inversion, and/or any other change or combination thereof.

In some embodiments, additional or alternative techniques may be used to address loci characterized by multiple repeats of a core sequence where the length of the repeat is longer than a typical sequencing read thereby making it difficult to determine whether a deletion or duplication of one or more core sequence units has occurred based solely on a sequence read.

In some embodiments, increased confidence in an assay result may be obtained by i) selecting two or more different preparative and/or analytical techniques that have different biases (e.g., known to have different biases), ii) evaluating a patient sample using the two or more different techniques, iii) comparing the results from the two or more different techniques, and/or iv) determining whether the results are consistent for the two or more different techniques. In some embodiments, if determining in step (iv) indicates that the results are consistent (e.g., the same) then increased confidence in the assay result is obtained. In other embodiments, if determining in step (iv) indicates that the results are inconsistent (e.g., that the results are ambiguous) then one or more additional preparative and/or analytical techniques, which have a different bias (e.g., known to have a different bias) compared with the two or more different preparative and/or analytical techniques selected in step (i), are used to evaluate the patient sample, and the results of the one or more additional preparative and/or analytical techniques are compared with the results from step (ii) to resolve the inconsistency.

In some embodiments, two or more independent samples may be obtained from a subject and independently analyzed. In some embodiments, two or more independent samples are obtained at approximately the same time point. In some embodiments, two or more independent samples are obtained at multiple different time points. In some embodiments, the use of two or more independent sample facilitates the elimination, normalization, and/or quantification of stochastic measurement noise. It is to be appreciated that two or more independent samples may be obtained in connection with any of the methods disclosed herein, including, for example, methods for pathogen profiling in a human or other animal subjects, monitoring tumor progression/regression, analyzing circulating tumor cells, analyzing fetal cells in maternal circulation, and analyzing/monitoring/profiling of environmental pathogens.

In some embodiments, one or more of the techniques described herein may be combined in a single assay protocol for evaluating multiple patient samples in parallel.

It should be appreciated that aspects of the invention may be useful for high throughput, cost-effective, yet reliable, genotyping of multiple patient samples (e.g., in parallel, for example in multiplex reactions). In some embodiments, aspects of the invention are useful to reduce the error frequency in a multiplex analysis. Certain embodiments may be particularly useful where multiple reactions (e.g., multiple loci and/or multiple patient samples) are being processed. For example, 10-25, 25-50, 50-75, 75-100 or more loci may be evaluated for each subject out of any number of subject samples that may be processed in parallel (e.g., 1-25, 25-50, 50-100, 100-500, 500-1,000, 1,000-2,500, 2,500-5,000 or more or intermediate numbers of patient samples). It should be appreciated that different embodiments of the invention may involve conducting two or more target capture reactions and/or two or more patient sample analyses in parallel in a single multiplex reaction. For example, in some embodiments a plurality of capture reactions (e.g., using different capture probes for different target loci) may be performed in a single multiplex reaction on a single patient sample. In some embodiments, a plurality of captured nucleic acids from each one of a plurality of patient samples may be combined in a single multiplex analysis reaction. In some embodiments, samples from different subjects are tagged with subject-specific (e.g., patient-specific) tags (e.g., unique sequence tags) so that the information from each product can be assigned to an identified subject. In some embodiments, each of the different capture probes used for each patient sample have a common patient-specific tag. In some embodiments, the capture probes do not have patient-specific tags, but the captured products from each subject may be amplified using one or a pair of amplification primers that are labeled with a patient-specific tag. Other techniques for associating a patient-specific tag with the captured product from a single patient sample may be used as aspects of the invention are not limited in this respect. It should be appreciated that patient-specific tags as used herein may refer to unique tags that are assigned to identified patients in a particular assay. The same tags may be used in a separate multiplex analysis with a different set of patient samples (e.g., from different patients) each of which is assigned one of the tags. In some embodiments, different sets of unique tags may be used in sequential (e.g., alternating) multiplex reactions in order to reduce the risk of contamination from one assay to the next and allow contamination to be detected on the basis of the presence of tags that are not expected to be present in a particular assay.

Embodiments of the invention may be used for any of a number of different settings: reproductive settings, disease screening, identifying subjects having cancer, identifying subjects having increased risk for a disease, stratifying a population of subjects according to one or more of a number of factors, for example responsiveness to a particular drug, lack or not of an adverse reaction (or risk therefore) to a particular drug, and/or providing information for medical records (e.g., homozygosity, heterozygosity at one or more loci). It should be appreciated that the invention is not limited to genomic analysis of patient samples. For example, aspects of the invention may be useful for high throughput genetic analysis of environment samples to detect pathogens.

In some embodiments, the methods disclosed herein are useful for diagnosis of one or more heritable disorders. In some embodiments, a heritable disorder that may be diagnosed with the methods disclosed herein is a genetic disorder that is prevalent in the Ashkenazi Jewish population. In some embodiments, the heritable disorders are selected from: 21-Hydroxylase-Defiocient Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia; ABCC8-Related Hyperinsulinism; Alpha-Thalassemia, includes Constant Spring, & MR associated; Arylsulfatase A Deficiency-Metyachromatic Leukodystrophy; Biotinidase Deficiency Holocarboxylase Synthetase Deficiency; Bloom's Syndrome; Canavan Disease; CFTR-Related Disorders-cystic fibrosis; Citrullinemia Type 1; Combined MMA & Homocystinuria-db1C; Dystrophinopathies (DMD & BMD); Familial Dysautonomia; Fanconi Anemia-FANCC; Galactosemia-Classical: Galactokinase Defiency & Galactose Epimerase Deficiency; Gaucher Disease; GJB2-Related DFNB 1 Nonsyndromic Hearing Loss and Deafness; Glutaric acidemia Type 1; Hemoglobinopathies beta-chain disorders; Glycogen Storage Disease Type 1A; Maple Syrup Urine Disease; Types 1A, 1B, 2, 3; Medium Chain Acyl-Coenzyme A; Dehydrogenase Deficiency-MCADD; Methylmalonic Acidemia; Mucolipidosis IV; Nemaline Myopathy; Nieman-Pick Type A-Acid Sphingomyelinase Deficiency; Non-Ketotic Hyperglycinemia-Glycine Encephalopathy; Ornithine Transcarbamylase Deficiency; PKU Phenylalanine Hydroxylase Deficiency; Propionic Acidemia; Short Chain Acyl-CoA Dehydrogenase Deficiency-SCADD; Smith-Lemli-Opitz Syndrome; Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMNI)-SMA; Tay Sachs-HexA Deficiency; Usher Synbdrome-Type I (Type IB, Type IC, Type ID, Type IF, Type IG); X-Linked Mental Retardation ARX-Related Disorders; X-Linked Mental Retardation with Cerebellar Cypoplasia and sistinctive Facial Appearance; X-Linked Mental Retardation; includes 9, 21, 30, 46, 58, 63, 88, 89; X linked mental retardation: FM1-Related Disorders—FRXA, Fragile X MR; X-linked SMR: Renpenning Syndrome 1; Zellweger Spectrum disorders—Peroxisomal Bifunctional Enzyme Deficiencies including Zellweger, NALD, and/or infantile Refsums. However, all of these, subsets of these, other genes, or combinations thereof may be used.

According to some aspects, the disclosure relates to multiplex diagnostic methods. In some embodiments, multiplex diagnostic methods comprise capturing a plurality of genetic loci in parallel (e.g., a genetic locus of Table 1). In some embodiments, genetic loci possess one or more polymorphisms (e.g., a polymorphism of Table 2) the genotypes of which correspond to disease causing alleles. Accordingly, in some embodiments, the disclosure provides methods for assessing multiple heritable disorders in parallel.

In some embodiments, methods are provided for diagnosing multiple heritable disorders in parallel at a pre-implantation, prenatal, perinatal, or postnatal stage. In some embodiments, the disclosure provides methods for analyzing multiple genetic loci (e.g., a plurality of target nucleic acids selected from Table 1) from a patient sample, such as a blood, pre-implantation embryo, chorionic villus or amniotic fluid sample. A patient or subject may be a human. However, aspects of the invention are not limited to humans and may be applied to other species (e.g., mammals, birds, reptiles, other vertebrates or invertebrates) as aspects of the invention are not limited in this respect. A subject or patient may be male or female. In some embodiments, in connection with reproductive genetic counseling, samples from a male and female member of a couple may be analyzed. In some embodiments, for example, in connection with an animal breeding program, samples from a plurality of male and female subjects may be analyzed to determine compatible or optimal breeding partners or strategies for particular traits or to avoid one or more diseases or conditions.

However, it should be appreciated that any other diseases may be studied and/or risk factors for diseases or disorders including, but not limited to allergies, responsiveness to treatment, cancer tumor profiling for treatment and prognosis, monitoring and identification of patient infections, and monitoring of environmental pathogens.

1. Reducing Representational Bias in Multiplex Amplification Reactions:

In some embodiments, aspects of the invention relate to methods that reduce bias and increase reproducibility in multiplex detection of genetic loci, e.g., for diagnostic purposes.

Molecular inversion probe technology is used to detect or amplify particular nucleic acid sequences in potentially complex mixtures. Use of molecular inversion probes has been demonstrated for detection of single nucleotide polymorphisms (Hardenbol et al. 2005 Genome Res 15:269-75) and for preparative amplification of large sets of exons (Porreca et al. 2007 Nat Methods 4:931-6, Krishnakumar et al. 2008 Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:9296-301). One of the main benefits of the method is in its capacity for a high degree of multiplexing, because generally thousands of targets may be captured in a single reaction containing thousands of probes. However, challenges associated with, for example, amplification efficiency (See, e.g., Turner E H, et al., Nat Methods. 2009 Apr. 6:1-2.) have limited the practical utility of the method in research and diagnostic settings.

Aspects of the disclosure are based, in part, on the discovery of effective methods for overcoming challenges associated with systematic errors (bias) in multiplex genomic capture and sequencing methods, namely high variability in target nucleic acid representation and unequal sampling of heterozygous alleles in pools of captured target nucleic acids (e.g., isolated from a biological sample). Accordingly, in some embodiments, the disclosure provides methods that reduce variability in the detection of target nucleic acids in multiplex capture methods. In other embodiments, methods improve allelic representation in a capture pool and, thus, improve variant detection outcomes. In certain embodiments, the disclosure provides preparative methods for capturing target nucleic acids (e.g., genetic loci) that involve the use of different sets of multiple probes (e.g., molecular inversion probes MIPs) that capture overlapping regions of a target nucleic acid to achieve a more uniform representation of the target nucleic acids in a capture pool compared with methods of the prior art. In other embodiments, methods reduce bias, or the risk of bias, associated with large scale parallel capture of genetic loci, e.g., for diagnostic purposes. In other embodiments, methods are provided for increasing reproducibility (e.g., by reducing the effect of polymorphisms on target nucleic acid capture) in the detection of a plurality of genetic loci in parallel. In further embodiments, methods are provided for reducing the effect of probe synthesis and/or probe amplification variability on the analysis of a plurality of genetic loci in parallel.

In some aspects, the disclosure provides probe sets that comprise a plurality of different probes. As used herein, a ‘probe’ is a nucleic acid having a central region flanked by a 5′ region and a 3′ region that are complementary to nucleic acids flanking the same strand of a target nucleic acid or subregion thereof. An exemplary probe is a molecular inversion probe (MIP). A ‘target nucleic acid’ may be a genetic locus.

Exemplary genetic loci are disclosed herein in Table 1 (RefSeqGene Column).

While probes have been typically designed to meet certain constraints (e.g. melting temperature, G/C content, etc.) known to partially affect capture/amplification efficiency (Ball et al (2009) Nat Biotech 27:361-8 AND Deng et al (2009) Nat Biotech 27:353-60), a set of constraints which is sufficient to ensure either largely uniform or highly reproducible capture/amplification efficiency has not previously been achieved.

As disclosed herein, uniformity and reproducibility can be increased by designing multiple probes per target, such that each base in the target is captured by more than one probe. In some embodiments, the disclosure provides multiple MIPs per target to be captured, where each MIP in a set designed for a given target nucleic acid has a central region and a 5′ region and 3′ region (‘targeting arms’) which hybridize to (at least partially) different nucleic acids in the target nucleic acid (immediately flanking a subregion of the target nucleic acid). Thus, differences in efficiency between different targeting arms and fill-in sequences may be averaged across multiple MIPs for a single target, which results in more uniform and reproducible capture efficiency.

In some embodiments, the methods involve designing a single probe for each target (a target can be as small as a single base or as large as a kilobase or more of contiguous sequence).

It may be preferable, in some cases, to design probes to capture molecules (e.g., target nucleic acids or subregions thereof) having lengths in the range of 1-200 bp (as used herein, a bp refers to a base pair on a double-stranded nucleic acid—however, where lengths are indicated in bps, it should be appreciated that single-stranded nucleic acids having the same number of bases, as opposed to base pairs, in length also are contemplated by the invention). However, probe design is not so limited. For example, probes can be designed to capture targets having lengths in the range of up to 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 1000, or more bps, in some cases.

It is to be appreciated that the length of a capture molecule (e.g., a target nucleic acid or subregion thereof) is selected based upon multiple considerations. For example, where analysis of a target involves sequencing, e.g., with a next-generation sequencer, the target length should typically match the sequencing read-length so that shotgun library construction is not necessary. However, it should be appreciated that captured nucleic acids may be sequenced using any suitable sequencing technique as aspects of the invention are not limited in this respect.

It is also to be appreciated that some target nucleic acids are too large to be captured with one probe. Consequently, it may be necessary to capture multiple subregions of a target nucleic acid in order to analyze the full target.

In some embodiments, a subregion of a target nucleic acid is at least 1 bp. In other embodiments, a subregion of a target nucleic acid is at least 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 600, 700, 800, 900, 1000 bp or more. In other embodiments, a subregion of a target nucleic acid has a length that is up to 10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90%, 95%, or more percent of a target nucleic acid length.

The skilled artisan will also appreciate that consideration is made, in the design of MIPs, for the relationship between probe length and target length. In some embodiments, MIPs are designed such that they are several hundred basepairs (e.g., up to 100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 600, 700, 800, 900, 1000 bp or more) longer than corresponding target (e.g., subregion of a target nucleic acid, target nucleic acid).

In some embodiments, lengths of subregions of a target nucleic acid may differ.

For example, if a target nucleic acid contains regions for which probe hybridization is not possible or inefficient, it may be necessary to use probes that capture subregions of one or more different lengths in order to avoid hybridization with problematic nucleic acids and capture nucleic acids that encompass a complete target nucleic acid.

Aspects of the invention involve using multiple probes, e.g., MIPs, to amplify each target nucleic acid. In some embodiments, the set of probes for a given target can be designed to ‘tile’ across the target, capturing the target as a series of shorter sub targets. In some embodiments, where a set of probes for a given target is designed to ‘tile’ across the target, some probes in the set capture flanking non-target sequence). Alternately, the set can be designed to ‘stagger’ the exact positions of the hybridization regions flanking the target, capturing the full target (and in some cases capturing flanking non-target sequence) with multiple probes having different targeting arms, obviating the need for tiling. The particular approach chosen will depend on the nature of the target set. For example, if small regions are to be captured, a staggered-end approach might be appropriate, whereas if longer regions are desired, tiling might be chosen. In all cases, the amount of bias-tolerance for probes targeting pathological loci can be adjusted (‘dialed in’) by changing the number of different MIPs used to capture a given molecule.

In some embodiments, the ‘coverage factor’, or number of probes used to capture a basepair in a molecule, is an important parameter to specify. Different numbers of probes per target are indicated depending on whether one is using the tiling approach (see, e.g., FIG. 1 ) or one of the staggered approaches (see, e.g., FIG. 2 or 3 ).

FIG. 1 illustrates a non-limiting embodiment of a tiled probe layout showing ten captured sub-targets tiled across a single target. Each position in the target is covered by three sub-targets such that MIP performance per base pair is averaged across three probes.

FIG. 2 illustrates a non-limiting embodiment of a staggered probe layout showing the targets captured by a set of three MIPs. Each MIP captures the full target, shown in black, plus (in some cases) additional extra-target sequence, shown in gray, such that the targeting arms of each MIP fall on different sequence. Each position in the target is covered by three sub-targets such that MIP performance per basepair is averaged across three probes. Targeting arms land immediately adjacent to the black or gray regions shown. It should be appreciated that in some embodiments, the targeting arms (not shown) can be designed so that they do not overlap with each other.

FIG. 3 illustrates a non-limiting embodiment of an alternating staggered probe layout showing the targets captured by a set of three MIPs. Each MIP captures the full target, shown in black, plus (in some cases) additional extra-target sequence, shown in gray, such that the targeting arms of each MIP fall on different sequence. Each position in the target is covered by three sub-targets such that MIP performance per basepair is averaged across three probes. Targeting arms land immediately adjacent to the black or gray regions shown.

It should be appreciated that for any of the layouts, the targeting arms on adjacent tiled or staggered probes may be designed to either overlap, not overlap, or overlap for only a subset of the probes.

In certain embodiments for any of the layouts, a coverage factor of about 3 to about 10 is used. However, the methods are not so limited and coverage factors of up to 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 20 or more may be used. It is to be appreciated that the coverage factor selected may depend the probe layout being employed. For example, in the tiling approach, for a desired coverage factor, the number of probes per target is typically a function of target length, sub-target length, and spacing between adjacent sub-target start locations (step size). For example, for a desired coverage factor of 3, a 200 bp target with a start-site separation of 20 bp and sub-target length of 60 bp may be encompassed with 12 MIPs (FIG. 1 ). Thus, a specific coverage factor may be achieved by varying the number of probes per target nucleic acid and the length of the molecules captured. In the staggered approach, a fixed-length target nucleic acid is captured as several subregions or as ‘super-targets’, which are molecules comprising the target nucleic acid and additional flanking nucleic acids, which may be of varying lengths. For example, a target of 50 bp can be captured at a coverage factor of 3 with 3 probes in either a ‘staggered’ (FIG. 2 ) or ‘alternating staggered’ configuration (FIG. 3 ).

The coverage factor will be driven by the extent to which detection bias is tolerable. In some cases, where the bias tolerance is small, it may be desirable to target more subregions of target nucleic acid with, perhaps, higher coverage factors. In some embodiments, the coverage factor is up to 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 or more.

In some embodiments, when a tiled probe layout is used, when the target length is greater than 1 bp and when a step size (distance between the 5′-end of a target and the 5′ end of its adjacent target) is less than the length of a target or subregion thereof, it is possible to compute probe number for a particular target based on target length (T), sub target length (S), and coverage factor (C), such that probe number=T/(S/C)+(C−1).

In some aspects, the disclosure provides methods to increase the uniformity of amplification efficiency when multiple molecules are amplified in parallel; methods to increase the reproducibility of amplification efficiency; methods to reduce the contribution of targeting probe variability to amplification efficiency; methods to reduce the effect on a given target nucleic acid of polymorphisms in probe hybridization regions; and/or methods to simplify downstream workflows when multiplex amplification by MIPs is used as a preparative step for analysis by nucleic acid sequencing.

Polymorphisms in the target nucleic acid under the regions flanking a target can interfere with hybridization, polymerase fill-in, and/or ligation. Furthermore, this may occur for only one allele, resulting in allelic drop-out, which ultimately decreases downstream sequencing accuracy. In some embodiments, using a set of MIPs having multiple hybridization sites for the capture of any given target, the probability of loss from polymorphism is substantially decreased because not all targeting arms in the set of MIPs will cover the location of the mutation.

Probes for MIP capture reactions may be synthesized on programmable microarrays because of the large number of sequences required. Because of the low synthesis yields of these methods, a subsequent amplification step is required to produce sufficient probe for the MIP amplification reaction. The combination of multiplex oligonucleotide synthesis and pooled amplification results in uneven synthesis error rates and representational biases. By synthesizing multiple probes for each target, variation from these sources may be averaged out because not all probes for a given target will have the same error rates and biases.

Multiplex amplification strategies disclosed herein may be used analytically, as in detection of SNPs, or preparatively, often for next-generation sequencing or other sequencing techniques. In the preparative setting, the output of an amplification reaction is generally the input to a shotgun library protocol, which then becomes the input to the sequencing platform. The shotgun library is necessary in part because next-generation sequencing yields reads significantly shorter than amplicons such as exons. In addition to the bias-reduction afforded by the multi-tiled approach described here, tiling also obviates the need for shotgun library preparation. Since the length of the capture molecule can be specified when the probes, e.g., MIPs, are designed, it can be chosen to match the readlength of the sequencer. In this way, reads can ‘walk’ across an exon by virtue of the start position of each capture molecule in the probe set for that exon. Reducing analytical errors associated with bias in nucleic acid preparations: In some embodiments, aspects of the invention relate to preparative steps in DNA sequencing-related technologies that reduce bias and increase the reliability and accuracy of downstream quantitative applications.

There are currently many genomics assays that utilize next-generation (polony-based) sequencing to generate data, including genome resequencing, RNA-seq for gene expression, bisulphite sequencing for methylation, and Immune-seq, among others. In order to make quantitative measurements (including genotype calling), these methods utilize the counts of sequencing reads of a given genomic locus as a proxy for the representation of that sequence in the original sample of nucleic acids. The majority of these techniques require a preparative step to construct a high-complexity library of DNA molecules that is representative of a sample of interest. This may include chemical or biochemical treatment of the DNA (e.g., bisulphite treatment), capture of a specific subset of the genome (e.g., padlock probe capture, solution hybridization), and a variety of amplification techniques (e.g., polymerase chain reaction, whole genome amplification, rolling circle amplification).

Systematic and random errors are common problems associated with genome amplification and sequencing library construction techniques. For example, genomic sequencing library may contain an over- or under-representation of particular sequences from a source genome as a result of errors (bias) in the library construction process. Such bias can be particularly problematic when it results in target sequences from a genome being absent or undetectable in the sequencing libraries. For example, an under representation of particular allelic sequences (e.g., heterozygotic alleles) from a genome in a sequencing library can result in an apparent homozygous representation in a sequencing library. As most downstream sequencing library quantification techniques depend on stochastic counting processes, these problems have typically been addressed by sampling enough (over-sampling) to obtain a minimum number of observations necessary to make statistically significant decisions. However, the strategy of oversampling is generally limited to elimination of low-count Poisson noise, and the approach wastes resources and increases the expense required to perform such experiments. Moreover, oversampling can result in a reduced statistical confidence in certain conclusions (e.g., diagnostic calls) based on the data. Accordingly, new approaches are needed for overcoming bias in sequencing library preparatory methods.

Aspects of the disclosure are based, in part, on the discovery of methods for overcoming problems associated with systematic and random errors (bias) in genome capture, amplification and sequencing methods, namely high variability in the capture and amplification of nucleic acids and disproportionate representation of heterozygous alleles in sequencing libraries. Accordingly, in some embodiments, the disclosure provides methods that reduce variability in the capture and amplification of nucleic acids. In other embodiments, the methods improve allelic representation in sequencing libraries and, thus, improve variant detection outcomes. In certain embodiments, the disclosure provides preparative methods for capturing target nucleic acids (e.g., genetic loci) that involve the use of differentiator tag sequences to uniquely tag individual nucleic acid molecules. In some embodiments, the differentiator tag sequence permits the detection of bias based on the frequency with which pairs of differentiator tag and target sequences are observed in a sequencing reaction. In other embodiments, the methods reduce errors caused by bias, or the risk of bias, associated with the capture, amplification and sequencing of genetic loci, e.g., for diagnostic purposes.

Aspects of the invention relate to associating unique sequence tags (referred to as differentiator tag sequences) with individual target molecules that are independently captured and/or analyzed (e.g., prior to amplification or other process that may introduce bias). These tags are useful to distinguish independent target molecules from each other thereby allowing an analysis to be based on a known number of individual target molecules. For example, if each of a plurality of target molecule sequences obtained in an assay is associated with a different differentiator tag, then the target sequences can be considered to be independent of each other and a genotype likelihood can be determined based on this information. In contrast, if each of the plurality of target molecule sequences obtained in the assay is associated with the same differentiator tag, then they probably all originated from the same target molecule due to over-representation (e.g., due to biased amplification) of this target molecule in the assay. This provides less information than the situation where each nucleic acid was associated with a different differentiator tag. In some embodiments, a threshold number of independently isolated molecules (e.g., unique combinations of differentiator tag and target sequences) is analyzed to determine the genotype of a subject.

In some embodiments, the invention relates to compositions comprising pools (libraries) of preparative nucleic acids that each comprise “differentiator tag sequences” for detecting and reducing the effects of bias, and for genotyping target nucleic acid sequences. As used herein, a “differentiator tag sequence” is a sequence of a nucleic acid (a preparative nucleic acid), which in the context of a plurality of different isolated nucleic acids, identifies a unique, independently isolated nucleic acid. Typically, differentiator tag sequences are used to identify the origin of a target nucleic acid at one or more stages of a nucleic acid preparative method. For example, in the context of a multiplex nucleic acid capture reaction, differentiator tag sequences provide a basis for differentiating between multiple independent, target nucleic acid capture events. Also, in the context of a multiplex nucleic acid amplification reaction, differentiator tag sequences provide a basis for differentiating between multiple independent, primary amplicons of a target nucleic acid, for example. Thus, combinations of target nucleic acid and differentiator tag sequence (target:differentiator tag sequences) of an isolated nucleic acid of a preparative method provide a basis for identifying unique, independently isolated target nucleic acids. FIG. 4A-C depict various non-limiting examples of methods for combining differentiator tag sequence and target sequences.

It will be apparent to the skilled artisan that differentiator tags may be synthesized using any one of a number of different methods known in the art. For example, differentiator tags may be synthesized by random nucleotide addition.

Differentiator tag sequences are typically of a predefined length, which is selected to control the likelihood of producing unique target:differentiator tag sequences in a preparative reaction (e.g., amplification-based reaction, a circularization selection-based reaction, e.g., a MIP reaction). Differentiator tag sequences may be, up to 5, up to 6, up to 7 up to 8, up to 9, up to 10, up to 11, up to 12, up to 13, up to 14, up to 15, up to 16, up to 17, up to 18, up to 19, up to 20, up to 21, up to 22, up to 23, up to 24, up to 25, or more nucleotides in length. For purposes of genotyping, isolated nucleic acids are identified as independently isolated if they comprise unique combinations of target nucleic acid and differentiator tag sequences, and observance of threshold numbers of unique combinations of target nucleic acid and differentiator tag sequences provide a certain statistical confidence in the genotype.

During a library preparation process, each nucleic acid molecule may be tagged with a unique differentiator tag sequence in a configuration that permits the differentiator tag sequence to be sequenced along with the target nucleic acid sequence of interest (the nucleic acid sequence for which the library is being prepared, e.g., a polymorphic sequence). The incorporation of the nucleic acid comprising a differentiator tag sequence at a particular step allows the detection and correction of biases in subsequent steps of the protocol.

A large library of unique differentiator tag sequences may be created by using degenerate, random-sequence polynucleotides of defined length. The differentiator tag sequences of the polynucleotides may be read at the final stage of the sequencing. The observations of the differentiator tag sequences may be used to detect and correct biases in the final sequencing read-out of the library. For example, the total possible number of differentiator tag sequences, which may be produced, e.g., randomly, is 4N, where N is the length of the differentiator tag sequence. Thus, it is to be understood that the length of the differentiator tag sequence may be adjusted such that the size of the population of MIPs having unique differentiator tag sequences is sufficient to produce a library of MIP capture products in which identical independent combinations of target nucleic acid and differentiator tag sequence are rare. As used herein combinations of target nucleic acid and differentiator tag sequences, may also be referred to as “target:differentiator tag sequences”.

In the final readout of a sequencing process, each read may have an additional unique differentiator tag sequence. In some embodiments, when differentiator tag sequences are distributed randomly in a library, all the unique differentiator tag sequences will be observed about an equal number of times. Accordingly, the number of occurrences of a differentiator tag sequence may follow a Poisson distribution.

In some embodiments, overrepresentation of target:differentiator tag sequences in a pool of preparative nucleic acids (e.g., amplified MIP capture products) is indicative of bias in the preparative process (e.g., bias in the amplification process). For example, target:differentiator tag sequence combinations that are statistically overrepresented are indicative of bias in the protocol at one or more steps between the incorporation of the differentiator tag sequences into MIPs and the actual sequencing of the MIP capture products.

The number of reads of a given target:differentiator tag sequence may be indicative (may serve as a proxy) of the amount of that target sequence present in the originating sample. In some embodiments, the numbers of occurrence of sequences in the originating sample is the quantity of interest. For example, using the methods disclosed herein, the occurrence of differentiator tag sequences in a pool of MIPs may be predetermined (e.g., may be the same for all differentiator tag sequences). Accordingly, changes in the occurrence of differentiator tag sequences after amplification and sequencing may be indicative of bias in the protocol. Bias may be corrected to provide an accurate representation of the composition of the original MIP pool, e.g., for diagnostic purposes.

According to some aspects, a library of preparative nucleic acid molecules (e.g., MIPs, each nucleic acid in the library having a unique differentiator tag sequence, may be constructed such that the number of nucleic acid molecules in the library is significantly larger than the number prospective target nucleic acid molecules to be captured using the library. This ensures that products of the preparative methods include only unique target:differentiator tag sequence; e.g., in a MIP reaction the capture step would undersample the total population of unique differentiator tag sequences in the MIP library. For example, an experiment utilizing 1 ug of genomic DNA will contain about ˜150,000 copies of a diploid genome. For a MIP library, each MIP in the library comprising a randomly produced 12-mer differentiator tag sequence (˜1.6 million possible unique differentiator tag sequences), there would be more than 100 unique differentiator tag sequences per genomic copy. For a MIP library, each MIP in the library comprising a randomly produced 15-mer differentiator tag sequence (˜1 billion possible unique differentiator tag sequences), there would be more than 7000 unique differentiator tag sequences per genomic copy. Therefore, the probability of the same differentiator tag sequence being incorporated multiple times is incredibly small. Thus, it is to be appreciated that the length of the differentiator tag sequence is to be selected based on the amount of target sequence in a MIP capture reaction and the desired probability for having multiple, independent occurrences of target:differentiator tag sequence combinations.

FIG. 5 depicts a non-limiting method for genotyping based on target and differentiator tag sequences. Sequencing reads of target and differentiator tags sequences are collapsed to make diploid genotype calls. FIG. 6 depicts non-limiting results of a simulation of a MIP capture reaction in which MIP probes, each having a differentiator tag sequence of 15 nucleotides, are combined with 10000 target sequence copies (e.g., genome equivalents). In this simulated reaction, the probability of capturing one or more copies of a target sequence having the same differentiator tag sequence is 0.05. The Y axis reflects the number of observations. The X axis reflects the number of independent occurrences of target:differentiator tag combinations. FIG. 7 depicts a non-limiting graph of sequencing coverage, which can help ensure that alleles are sampled to sufficient depth (e.g., either 10× or 20× minimum sampling per allele, assuming 1000 targets). In this non-limiting example, the X axis is total per-target coverage required, and the Y axis is the probability that a given total coverage will result in at least 10× or 20× coverage for each allele.

The skilled artisan will appreciate that as part of a MIP library preparation process, adapters may be ligated onto the ends of the molecules of interest. Adapters often contain PCR primer sites (for amplification or emulsion PCR) and/or sequencing primer sites. In addition, barcodes may be included, for example, to uniquely identify individual samples (e.g., patient samples) that may be mixed together. (See, e.g., USPTO Publication Number US 2007/0020640 A1 (McCloskey et al.)

The actual incorporation of the random differentiator tag sequences can be performed through various methods known in the art. For example, nucleic acids comprising differentiator tag sequences may be incorporated by ligation. This is a flexible method, because molecules having differentiator tag sequence can be ligated to any blunt-ended nucleic acids. The sequencing primers must be incorporated subsequently such that they sequence both the differentiator tag sequence and the target sequence. Alternatively, the sequencing adaptors can be synthesized with the random differentiator tag sequences at their 3′ end (as degenerate bases), so that only one ligation must be performed. Another method is to incorporate the differentiator tag sequence into a PCR primer, such that the primer structure is arranged with the common adaptor sequence followed by the random differentiator tag sequence followed by the PCR priming sequence (in 5′ to 3′ order). A differentiator tag sequence and adaptor sequence (which may contain the sequencing primer site) are incorporated as tags. Another method to incorporate the differentiator tag sequences is to synthesize them into a padlock probe prior to performing a gene capture reaction. The differentiator tag sequence is incorporated 3′ to the targeting arm but 5′ to the amplification primer that will be used downstream in the protocol. Another method to incorporate the differentiator tag sequences is as a tag on a gene-specific or poly-dT reverse-transcription primer. This allows the differentiator tag sequence to be incorporated directly at the cDNA level.

In some embodiments, at the incorporation step, the distribution of differentiator tag sequences can be assumed to be uniform. In this case, bias in any part of the protocol would change the uniformity of this distribution, which can be observed after sequencing. This allows the differentiator tag sequence to be used in any preparative process where the ultimate output is sequencing of many molecules in parallel.

Differentiator tag sequences may be incorporated into probes (e.g., MIPs) of a plurality when they are synthesized on-chip in parallel, such that degeneracy of the incorporated nucleotides is sufficient to ensure near-uniform distribution in the plurality of probes. It is to be appreciated that amplification of a pool of unique differentiator tag sequences may itself introduce bias in the initial pool. However, in most practical cases, the scale of synthesis (e.g., by column synthesis, chip based synthesis, etc.) is large enough that amplification of an initial pool of differentiator tag sequences is not necessary. By avoiding amplification or selection steps on the pool of unique differentiator tag sequences, potential bias may be minimized. One example of the use of the differentiator tag sequences is in genome re-sequencing.

Considering that the raw accuracy of most next-generation sequencing instruments is relatively low, it is crucial to oversample the genomic loci of interest.

Furthermore, since there are two alleles at every locus, it is important to sample enough to ensure that both alleles have been observed a sufficient number of times to determine with a sufficient degree of statistical confidence whether the sample is homozygous or heterozygous. Indeed, the sequencing is performed to sample the composition of molecules in the originating sample. However, after multiple reads have been collected for a given locus, it is possible that due to bias (e.g., caused by PCR amplification steps), a large fraction of the reads are derived from a single originating molecule. This would skew the population of target sequences observed, and would affect the outcome of the genotype call. For example, it is possible that a locus that is heterozygous is called as homozygous, because there are only a few observations of the second allele out of many observations of that locus. However, if information is available on differentiator tag sequences, this situation could be averted, because the over-represented allele would be seen to also have an over-represented differentiator tag sequence (i.e., the sequences with the overrepresented differentiator tag sequence all originated from the same single molecule). Therefore, the sequences and corresponding distribution of differentiator tag sequences can be used as an additional input to the genotype-calling algorithm to significantly improve the accuracy and confidence of the genotype calls.

In some aspects, the disclosure provides methods for analyzing a plurality of target sequences which are genetic loci or portions of genetic loci (e.g., a genetic locus of Table 1). The genetic loci may be analyzed by sequencing to obtain a genotype at one or more polymorphisms (e.g., SNPs). Exemplary polymorphisms are disclosed in Table 2. The skilled artisan will appreciate that other polymorphisms are known in the art and may be identified, for example, by querying the Entrez Single Nucleotide Polymorphism database, for example, by searching with a GeneID from Table 1.

TABLE 1 Target Nucleic Acids Gene  Gene  Chromosome  name ID Description Gene aliases OMIM RefSeqGene map position CYP21 A2 1589 cytochrome P450,  CAH1; CPS1; CA21H;  201910 NG_008337,1 6p21.3 family 21, subfamily A,  CYP21; CYP21B;  polypeptide 2 P450c21B; MGC150536;  MGC150537; CYP21 A2 ABCC8 6833 ATP-binding cassette,  HI; SUR; HHF1; MRP8;  600509 NG_008867.1 11p15.1 sub-family C  PHHI; SUR1; ABC36;  (CFTR/MRP),  HRINS; TNDM2; ABCC8 member 8 ATRX 546 alpha  SHS; XH2; XNP; ATR2;  300032 NG_008838.1 Xq13.1- thalassemia/mental  SFM1; RAD54;  q21.1 retardation syndrome  MRXHF1; RAD54L;  X-linked (RAD54  ZNF-HX; MGC2094;  homolog, S. cerevisiae) ATRX ARSA 410 arylsulfatase A MLD; ARSA 607574 NG_009260.1 22q13.31- qter; 22q13.33 PSAP 5660 Prosaposin GLBA; SAP1; FLJ00245;  176801 NG_008835.1 10q21- MGC110993; PSAP q22 BTD 686 Biotinidase BTD 609019 NG_008019.1 3p25 HLCS 3141 holocarboxylase  HCS; HLCS 609018 NC_000021.7 21q22.1;  synthetase (biotin- 21q22.13 (proprionyl-Coenzyme  A-carboxylase (ATP- hydrolysing)) ligase) BLM 641 Bloom syndrome,  BS; RECQ2; RECQL2;  604610 NG_007272.1 15q26.1 RecQ helicase-like RECQL3; MGC126616;  MGC131618;  MGC131620; BLM ASPA 443 aspartoacylase  ASP; ACY2; ASPA 608034 NG_008399.1 17pter-P13 (Canavan disease) CFTR 1080 cystic fibrosis  CF; MRP7; ABC35;  602421 NC_000007.12 7q31.2 transmembrane  ABCC7; CFTR/MRP;  conductance regulator  TNR-CFTR; dJ760C5.1;  (ATP-binding cassette  CFTR sub-family C,  member 7) ASS1 445 argininosuccinate  ASS; CTLN1; ASS1 603470 NG_011542.1 9q34.1 synthetase 1 MMACHC 25974 methylmalonic aciduria  cb1C; FLJ25671;  609831 NC_000001.9 1p34.1 (cobalamin deficiency)  DKFZp564I122; RP11- cb1C type, with  291L19.3; MMACWC homocystinuria IKBKAP 8518 inhibitor of kappa light  FD; DYS; ELP1; IKAP;  603722 NG_008788.1 9q31 polypeptide gene  IKI3; TOT1; FLJ12497;  enhancer in B-cclls,  DKFZp781H1425;  kinase complex- IKBKAP associated protein FANCC 2176 Fanconi anemia,  FA3; FAC; FACC;  227645 NG_011707.1 9q22.3 complementation  FLJ14675; FANCC group C GALK1 2584 galactokinase 1 GK1; GALK; GALK1 604313 NG_008079.1 17q24 GALT 2592 galactose-1-phosphate  GALT 606999 NC_000009.10 9p13 uridylyltransferase GALE 2582 UDP-galactose-4- SDR1E1; FLJ95174;  606953 NG_007068.1 1p36-p35 epimcrase FLJ97302; GALE GBA 2629 glucosidase, beta; acid  GCB; GBA1; GLUC;  606463 NG_009783.1 1q21 (includes  GBA glucosylceramidase) GJB2 2706 gap junction protein,  HID; KID; PPK; CX26;  121011 NG_008358.1 13q11-q12 beta 2, 26 kDa DFNA3; DFNB1; NSRD1;  DFNA3A; DFNB1A;  GJB2 GCDH 2639 glutaryl-Cocnzyme A  GCD; ACAD5; GCDH 608801 NG_009292.1 19p13.2 dehydrogenase G6PC 2538 glucose-6-phosphatase,  G6PT; GSD1; GSD1a;  232200 NG_011808.1 17q21 catalytic subunit MGCI63350; G6PC HBB 3043 hemoglobin, beta CD113t-C; beta-globin;  141900 NG_000007.3 11p15.5 HBB BCKDHA 593 branched chain keto MSU; MSUD1; OVD1A; 608348 NC_000019.8 19q13.1- acid dehydrogenase E1, BCKDE1A; FLJ45695; q13.2 alpha polypeptide BCKDHA BCKDHB 594 branched chain keto E1B; FLJ17880; 248611 NG_009775.1 6q13-q15 acid dehydrogenase E1 , dJ279A18.1; BCKDHB beta polypeptide DBT 1629 dihydrolipoamide E2; E2B; BCATE2; 248610 NG_011852.1 1p31 branched chain MGC9061; DBT transacylase E2 DLD 1738 dihydrolipoamide E3; LAD; DLDH; GCSL; 238331 NG_008045.1 7q31-q32 dehydrogenase PHE3; DLD ACADM 34 acyl-Coenzyme A MCAD; ACAD1; 607008 NG_007045.1 1p31 dehydrogenase, C-4 to MCADH; FLJ18227; C-12 straight chain FLJ93013; FLJ99884; ACADM MMAA 166785 methylmalonic aciduria cblA; MGC120010; 607481 NG_007536.1 4q31.22 (cobalamin deficiency) MGC120011; cblA type MGC120012; MGC120013; MMAA MMAB 326625 methylmalonic aciduria ATR; cblB; MGC20496; 607568 NG_007096.1 12q24 (cobalamin deficiency) MMAB cblB type MUT 4594 methylmalonyl MCM; MUT 609058 NG_007100.1 6p12.3 Coenzyme A mutase MCOLN 57192 mucolipin 1 ML4; MLIV; MST080; 605248 NC_000019.8 19p13.3- 1 TRPML1; MSTP080; p13.2 TRP-ML1; TRPM-L1 ; MCOLN1 ACTA1 58 actin, alpha 1, skeletal ACTA; ASMA; CFTD; 102610 NG_006672.1 1q42.13 muscle MPFD; NEM1; NEM2; NEM3; CFTD1; CFTDM; ACTA1 TPM3 7170 tropomyosin 3 TM3; TRK; NEM1; TM- 191030 NG_008621.1 1q21.2 5; TM30; TM30 nm; TPMsk3; hscp30; MGC3261; FLJ41118; MGC14582; MGC72094; OK/SW-c1.5; TPM3 TNNT1 7138 troponin T type 1 ANM; TNT; STNT; 191041 NG_011829.1 19q13.4 (skeletal, slow) TNTS; FLJ98147; MGC104241; TNNT1 NEB 4703 nebulin NEM2; NEB177D; 161650 NG_009382.1 2q22 FLJ11505; FLJ36536; FLJ39568; FLJ39584; DKFZp686C1456; NEB SMPD1 6609 sphingomyelin ASM; NPD; SMPD1 607608 NG_011780.1 11p15.4- phosphodiesterase 1, p15.1 acid lysosomal GLDC 2731 glycine dehydrogenase GCE; NKH; GCSP; 238300 NC_000009.10 9p22 (decarboxylating) HYGN1; MGC138198; MGC138200; GLDC GCSH 2653 glycine cleavage GCE; NKH; GCSH 238330 NC_000016.8 16q23.2 system protein H (aminomethyl carrier)  AMT 275 aminomethyltransferase GCE; NKH; GCST; AMT 238310 NC_000003.10 3p21.2- p21.1 OTC 5009 ornithine OCTD; MGC129967; 300461 NG_008471.1 Xp21.1 carbamoyltransferase MGC129968; MGC138856; OTC PAH 5053 phenylalanine PH; PKU; PKU1; PAH 612349 NG_008690.1 12g22- hydroxylase q24.2 DHPR 5860 quinoid DHPR; PKU2; SDR33C1; 612676 NG_008763.1 4p15.31 dihydropteridine FLJ42391; QDPR reductase PTS 5805 6- PTPS; FLJ97081; PTS 261640 NG_008743.1 11q22.3- pyruvoyltetrahydropterin  q23.3 synthase PCCA 5095 propionyl Coenzyme A PCCA 232000 NG_008768.1 13q32 carboxylase, alpha polypeptide PCCB 5096 propionyl Coenzyme A DKFZp451E113; PCCB 232050 NG_008939.1 3q21-q22 carboxylase, beta polypeptide ACADS 35 acyl-Coenzyme A SCAD; ACAD3; ACADS 606885 NG_007991.1 12g22- dehydrogenase, C-2 to qter C-3 short chain DHCR7 1717 7-dehydrocholesterol SLOS; DHCR7 602858 NC_000011.8 11q13.2- reductase q13.5 SMNT 6606 survival of motor SMA; SMN; SMA1; 600354 NG_008691.1 5q13 neuron 1, telomeric SMA2; SMA3; SMA4; SMA@; SMNT; BCD541; T-BCD541; SMN1 HEXA 3073 hexosaminidase A TSD; MGC99608; HEXA 606869 NG_009017.1 15g23- (alpha polypeptide) q24 MYO7A 4647 myosin VIIA DFNB2; MYU7A; 276903 NG_009086.1 11q13.5 NSRD2; USH1B; DFNA11; MYOVIIA; MYO7A USH1C 10083 Usher syndrome 1 C PDZ73; AIE-75; 605242 NC_000011.8 11p15.1- (autosomal recessive,  DFNB18; PDZ-45; PDZ- p14 severe) 73; NY-CO-37; NY-CO- 38; ush1cpst; PDZ-73/NY- CO-38; USH1C CDH23 64072 cadherin-like 23 USH1D; DFNB12; 605516 NG_008835.1 10g21- FLJ00233; FLJ36499; q22 KIAA1774; KIAA1812; MGC102761; DKFZp434P2350; CDH23 PCDH15 65217 protocadherin 15 USH1F; DFNB23; 605514 NG_009191.1 10q21.1 DKFZp667A1711; PCDH15 SANS 124590 Usher syndrome 1G  SANS; ANKS4A;  607696 NG_007882.1 17q25.1 (autosomal recessive) FLJ33924; USH1G ARX 170302 aristaless related  ISSX; PRTS; MRX29;  300382 NG_008281.1 Xp21 homeobox MRX32; MRX33;  MRX36; MRX38;  MRX43; MRX54;  MRX76; MRX87;  MRXS1; ARX OPHN1 4983 oligophrenin 1 OPN1; MRX60; OPHN1 300127 NG_008960.1 Xq12 JAR1DIC 8242 lysine (K)-specific  MRXJ; SMCX; MRXSJ;  314690 NG_008085.1 Xp11.22- demethylase 5C XE169; JARID1C;  p11.21 DXS1272E; KDM5C FTSJ1 24140 FtsJ homolog 1  JM23; MRX9; SPB1;  300499 NG_008879.1 Xp11.23 (E. coli) TRM7; CDLIV; MRX44;  FTSJ1 SLC6A8 6535 solute carrier family 6  CRT; CT1; CRTR;  300036 NC_000023.9 Xq28 (neurotransmitter  MGC87396; SLC6A8 transporter, creatine),  member 8 DLG3 1741 discs, large homolog 3  MRX; MRX90; NEDLG;  300189 NC_000023.9 Xq13.1 (Drosophila) NE-Dlg; SAP102; SAP- 102; KIAA1232; DLG3 TM4SF2 7102 letraspanin 7 A15; MXS1; CD231;  300096 NG_009160.1 Xp11.4 MRX58; CCG-B7;  TM4SF2; TALLA-1;  TM4SF2b; DXS1692E;  TSPAN7 ZNF41 7592 zinc finger protein 41 MRX89; MGC8941;  314995 NG_008238.1 Xp11.23 ZNF41 FACL4 2182 acyl-CoA synthetase  ACS4; FACL4; LACS4;  300157 NG_008053.1 Xq22.3- long-chain family  MRX63; MRX68; ACSL4 q23 member 4 PQBP1 10084 polyglutamine binding  SHS; MRX55; MRXS3;  300463 NC_000023.9 Xp11.23 protein 1 MRXS8; NPW38;  RENS1; PQBP1 PEX1 5189 peroxisomal biogenesis  ZWS1; PEX1 602136 NG_008341.1 7q21.2 factor 1 PXMP3 5828 peroxisomal membrane  PAF1; PEX2; PMP3;  170993 NG_008371.1 8q21.1 protein 3, 35 kDa PAF-1; PMP35; RNF72;  PXMP3 PEX6 5190 peroxisomal biogenesis  PAF2; PAF-2; PXAAA1;  601498 NG_008370.1 6p21.1 factor 6 PEX6 PEX10 5192 peroxisomal biogenesis  NALD; RNF69;  602859 NG_008342.1 1p36.32 factor 10 MGC1998; PEX10 PEX12 5193 peroxisomal biogenesis  PAF-3; PEX12 601758 NG_008447.1 17q12 factor 12 PEX5 5830 peroxisomal biogenesis  PXR1; PTS1R; PTS1-BP;  600414 NG_008448.1 12p13.31 factor 5 FLJ50634; FLJ50721;  FLJ51948; PEX5 PEX26 55670 peroxisomal biogenesis  FLJ20695; PEX26M1T;  608666 NG_008339.1 22q11.21 factor 26 Pex26pM1T; PEX26

The mutations listed in Table 2 are documented polymorphisms in several disease-associated genes (CFTR is mutated in cystic fibrosis, GBA is mutated in Gaucher disease, ASPA is mutated in Canavan disease, HEXA is mutated in Tay Sachs disease). The polymorphisms are of several types: insertion/deletion polymorphisms which will cause frameshifts (and thus generally interrupt protein function) unless the insertion/deletion length is a multiple of 3 bp, and substitutions which can alter the amino acid sequence of the protein and in some cases cause complete inactivation by introduction of a stop codon.

TABLE 2 Non-limiting examples of polymorphisms Gene SEQ ID name GeneID SNP ID Mutation NO: CFTR 1080 rs63500661 TCACATCACCAAGTTAAAAAAAAAAA[A/G]G 1 GGGCGGGGGGGCAGAATGAAAATT CFTR 1080 rs63107760 AAACAAGGATGAATTAAGTTTTTTTT[-/T] 2 AAAAAAGAAACATTTGGTAAGGGGA CFTR 1080 rs62469443 ATCACCAAGTTAAAAAAAAAAAAGGG[A/G]C 3 GGGGGGGCAGAATGAAAATTGCAT CFTR 1080 rs62469442 CTATTGAACCAGAACCAAACAGGAAT[A/G]C 4 CATAGCATTTTGTAAACTAAACTG CFTR 1080 rs62469441 CAGGAGTTCAAGACCAGCCTACTAAA[A/C]C 5 ACACACACACACACACACACACAC CFTR 1080 rs62469439 GATTAAATAATAGTGTTTATGTACCC[C/G]GC 6 TTATAGGAGAAGAGGGTGTGTGT CFTR 1080 rs62469438 ATTGTTATCTTTTCATATAAGGTAAC[A/T]GA 7 GGCCCAGAGAGATTAAATAACAT CFTR 1080 rs62469437 TAATTTTAATTAAGTAAATTTAATTG[A/G]TA 8 GATAAATAAGTAGATAAAAAATA CFTR 1080 rs62469436 GTATAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAGTT[A/T]G 9 AATGTTTTCTTGCATTCAGAGCCT CFTR 1080 rs62469435 ATACTAAAAATTTAAAGTTCTCTTGC[A/G]AT 10 ATATTTTCTTAATATCTTACATC CFTR 1080 rs62469434 TGCTGGGATTACAGGCGTGAGCCACC[A/G]C 11 GCCTGGCCTGATGGGACATATTTT CFTR 1080 rs62469433 CTACAATATAAGTATAGTATTGCAAA[A/C]CC 12 ATCAGGAAGGGTGTTAACTATTT CFTR 1080 rs61763210 GTTGTCTCCAAACTTTTTTTCAGGTG[-/AGA] 13 AGGTGGCCAACCGAGCTTCGGAAAG CFTR 1080 rs61720488 TTTTTTCATAAAAGATTATATAAAGG[A/C]TA 14 TTGCTTTTGAATCACAAACACTA CFTR 1080 rs61481156 ATCTAGTGAGCAGTCAGGAAAGAGAA[C/T]T 15 TCCAGATCCTGGAAATCAGGGTTA CFTR 1080 rs61443875 TAGAGTATAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA[-/A] 16 GTTTGAATGTTTTCTTGCATTCAGA CFTR 1080 rs61312222 TGCAAATGCCAACTATCAAAGATATT[C/G]GA 17 GTATACTGTCAATAAACTTCATA CFTR 1080 rs61159372 TCCTCAACAGTTAGAAACAATATTTT[C/G]AG 18 TGATTTCCCATGCCAACTTTACT CFTR 1080 rs61094145 TTTTTGGTATTGTTGTTAAATAAGTG[A/G]GA 19 ATTCAATACAGTATAATGTCTGT CFTR 1080 rs61086387 CTTGAAATCGGATATATATATATATA[-/T 20 GTATATATATATATATATATATATATATAT ACATATATATATATA]GTATTATCCCTGTTTTC ACAGTTTT CFTR 1080 rs60996744 AGAGGGGCTGTGAAGGACACCAAGGA[A/G]G 21 AGACTAAGAGCCAGGAGGGAAAAC CFTR 1080 rs60960860 TAGAGTTTATTAGCTTTTACTACTCT[A/G]CTT 22 AGTTACTTTGTGTTACAGAATA CFTR 1080 rs60923902 ACTAGTGATGATGAGCTTCTTTTCAT[-/AT] 23 GTTTGTTGGCTGCATAAATGTCTTC CFTR 1080 rs60912824 GCAGAGAAAAGAGGGGCTGTGAAGGA[C/G]A 24 CCAAGGAGGAGACTAAGAGCCAGG CFTR 1080 rs60887846 TTCAGAGGTCTACCACTGGTGCATAC[G/T]CT 25 AATCACAGTGTCGAAAATTTTAC CFTR 1080 rs60793174 AAGAAAGAGCAAAAGAGGGCAAACTT[C/T]T 26 CATACATTTTTGATGTCGAAACCA CFTR 1080 rs60788575 CCTAAAGTTTAAAAAGAAAAAAAAAA[-/A] 27 GGAAGAAGGAATTAAAAATCCAAAG CFTR 1080 rs60760741 GTGTGTGTGTGTATATATATATATAT[A/T]TA 28 TATATTTTTTTTTTCCTGAGCCA CFTR 1080 rs60456599 AAACTGTTGATGTTTTCATTTATTTA[C/G]ATC 29 ATTGGAAAACTTTAGATTCTAG CFTR 1080 rs60363249 TTTATCCATTCTTAACCAGAACAGAC[A/G]TT 30 TTTTCAGAGCTGGTCCAGGAAAA CFTR 1080 rs60355115 TTGAAATCGGATATATATATATATAT[A/G]TA 31 TATATATATATATATATATATAT CFTR 1080 rs60308689 TAGTTTTTTATTTCCTCATATTATTT[-/T] 32 CAGTGGCTTTTTTCTTCCACATCTTT CFTR 1080 rs60271242 ACATAGTTCTCAGTGGTACAACTACA[A/G]GT 33 GATTTCTCTTTTCTTATTTCTGG CFTR 1080 rs60010318 AGAGCAATGGCATCCCTTGTCTTGTG[C/T]TA 34 TACAGGATGCAGCAATTTATAGG CFTR 1080 rs59961323 TTCTGTCTACATAAGATGTCATACTA[A/G]AT 35 TATCTTTTCCAGCATGCATTCAG CFTR 1080 rs59961270 CAGGGTGGCATGTTAGGCAGTGCTTA[A/G]A 36 ATAAATGAGTTGGTTATACAAGTA CFTR 1080 rs59837506 AGGACACACACACACACACACACACA[-/CA] 37 TGCACACACATTTAAATAGATGCAT CFTR 1080 rs59572090 TAAAAAATTGGTATAATGAAATTGCA[C/T]TT 38 GTAGTCTTTGGACATTTAAATCC CFTR 1080 rs59548252 TTTCAATACTTAAGAGGTACGCAGAG[A/G]A 39 AAGAGGGGCTGTGAAGGACACCAA CFTR 1080 rs59519859 CAGCAATGAATATTTTGAGGCTGAGG[C/T]GC 40 TGAGGGGTAAAATTGCAGCCTGG CFTR 1080 rs59509837 TTATGGTTTATATTTTGTGTCTTCT[-/C 41 TTT]AACACATCTTTTCTAGCAGAATTCA CFTR 1080 rs59417037 GTATTTTAGTTTTTTTTTTTTGTTTG[-/T] 42 TTTGTTTTGTTTTGTTTTGTTTTTG CFTR 1080 rs59159458 TGGGTGACTCCATTTTTACTTTTAGT[C/T]TGG 43 TCTGTTGAGGCCTCGTGAGAGA CFTR 1080 rs59048119 TATTTTCATGTATTTTAGTTTTTTTTT[-/T 44 TTT]GTTTGTTTTGTTTTGTTTTGTTTTG CFTR 1080 rs58970500 GTGTGTGTGTATATATATATATATAT[A/T]TA 45 TATTTTTTTTTTCCTGAGCCAAA CFTR 1080 rs58942292 AACCTATTAGCATGTCTGGCAGAAAA[-/A] 46 TAGATACTTAATAAATTTCTTAAAT CFTR 1080 rs58917054 GAGGCTTAGACAGTTTAAGTAACTCA[A/G]G 47 CATGGTTACACAACTAGCTAGGGC CFTR 1080 rs58837484 GTGTGAGTATTATGAGACCATATGTT[A/G]GG 48 AGATTTTATTTGGTATTGAGGAT CFTR 1080 rs58829491 GAAACCCCACCCCTTCTATAGTTTTC[C/T]CTT 49 TAATATTTACAATGGAACCATT CFTR 1080 rs58805195 CATATATATATAGTGTGTGTGTGTGT[A/G]TA 50 TATATATATATATATATATTTTT GBA 2629 rs60866785 CGAGCGAGAGAGAGAGAGAGAGAGAG[-/AG] 51 GAGCCGGCGCGAGAACTACGCATGC GBA 2629 rs60239603 GGCAGGTAATATCTAGTACCTTACTT[A/T]TA 52 TTTCCTGAGCACATTCTACATTT GBA 2629 rs56310840 GGCCAGGAATGGGAGTGCTTAGGTGC[A/G]G 53 AGGTGGCACTGTTCCCGCAGCTGC GBA 2629 rs41264927 GAAAACTCCATCCCCTCAGGGTCAT[C/T]AG 54 ATGAAGAGAAGACCACAGGGGTT GBA 2629 rs41264925 TGTAGGTAAGGGTCACATGTGGGAGA[C/G]G 55 CAGCTGTGGGTAGGTCAGCCCTGT GBA 2629 rs36024691 CCAAGAAGGCGCCATTACACTCCAGC[-/C] 56 TGGGCGACAGGGCGAGACTCCCTCA GBA 2629 rs36024092 TGCCACACCCAGCTAATTTGTGTGTG[-/G] 57 TATGTGTGTGTATGTATGTGTGTGT GBA 2629 rs35682967 GTTCCTCCAGTAATTTTTTTTTTTTT[-T/] 58 GGTTTTGAGACAGAGTCTTGCCCTG GBA 2629 rs35033592 ATCATGCCCAGATAATTTTTTTTTTT[-/T] 59 GTATTTTAGTAGACACAGGGTTTCA GBA 2629 rs34732744 CGAGCGAGAGAGAGAGAGAGAGAGAG[-/AG] 60 GAGCCGGCGCGAGAACTACGCATGC GBA 2629 rs34620635 CCTGTGAGGGGCACATTCCTTAGTAG[-/C] 61 TAAGGAGTTGGGGGTGTGAAGATCC GBA 2629 rs34302637 ACAGGCTACTGGCTGGGCCCAGGCAA[-/A] 62 GGGGGCCTTGGCAGGAAAAGTTCCT GBA 2629 rs33949225 GCGAGAGAGAGAGAGAGAGAGAGAGG[-/AG] 63 AGCCGGCGCGAGAACTACGCATGCG GBA 2629 rs28678003 AAGAAGAAAAATAAAAAGAAAGTGGG[C/T]C 64 AGACCGAGAGAACAGGAAGCCTGA GBA 2629 rs28559737 AAGGACAAAGGCAAAGAGACAAAGGC[G/T]C 65 AACACTGGGGGTCCCCAGAGAGTG GBA 2629 rs28373017 TACCTAGTCACTTCCTGCCTCCATGG[C/T]GC 66 AAAAGGGGATGGGTGTGCCTCTT GBA 2629 rs12752133 CTCTTCCGAGGTTCCACCCTGAACAC[C/T]TT 67 CCTGCTCCCTCGTGGTGTAGAGT GBA 2629 rs12747811 TTCTGACTGGCAACCAGCCCCACTCT[C/T]TG 68 GGAGCCCTCAGGAATGAACTTGC GBA 2629 rs12743554 gctcagcctcccaggctggagtgcag[A/T]ggcgcgatc 69 tcggctcaccgcaacc GBA 2629 rs12041778 CATGAACCACATCAAATGAGATTTAG[C/T]GG 70 GAGTGGCACACACAGTCATGACC GBA 2629 rs12034326 AAGCAGCCCTGGGGAGTCGGGGCGGG[A/G]C 71 CTGGATTGGAAAAGAGACGGTCAC GBA 2629 rs11558184 CTCCAAGTTCTGGGAGCAGAGTGTGC[A/G]G 72 CTAGGCTCCTGGGATCGAGGGATG GBA 2629 rs11430678 GTTCCTCCAGTAAttttttttttttt[-/G/T] 73 gttttgagacagagtcttgccctgt GBA 2629 rs11264345 CTAGTACCTTACTTCCCTCAAGTTCA[A/T]TC 74 ATCTCACAGATATTTCCTGAGCA GBA 2629 rs10908459 aattagccgtgcgtggtggcgggtgc[C/T]tgtaatccc 75 acgtacttgggaggct GBA 2629 rs10796940 CCATGGCCAGCCGGGGAGGGGACGGG[A/C]A 76 CACACAGACCCACACAGAGACTCA GBA 2629 rs10668496 agcgagagagagagagagagagagag[-/AG] 77 gagCCGGCGCGAGAACTACGCATGC GBA 2629 rs7416991 CGTAGCAGTTAGCAGATGATAGGCGG[C/G/T] 78 GAAATCTTATTTCACAGGGCATTAA GBA 2629 rs4024049 CTGGCCCTGGTGACAGTGGGGCTGTG[C/T]GT 79 GGGGCCAGAGCCTTCTCAGAGGT GBA 2629 rs4024048 CAGATACTGGCCCTGGTGACAGTGGG[A/G]C 80 TGTGCGTGGGGCCAGAGCCTTCTC GBA 2629 rs4024047 GACAGATACTGGCCCTGGTGACAGTG[G/T]G 81 GCTGTGCGTGGGGCCAGAGCCTTC GBA 2629 rs3841430 GGCTCctctctctctctctctctctc[-/TC] 82 gctcgctctctcgctctctcgctct GBA 2629 rs3754485 GTTTCAGACCAGCCTGGCCAACATAG[C/T]GA 83 AACCCCATCTCTACTAAAAATAA GBA 2629 rs3205619 AGTGGGCGATTGGATGGAGCTGAGTA[C/T]G 84 GGGCCCATCCAGGCTAATCACACC GBA 2629 rs2990227 CCGGGCTCCGTGAATGTTTGTCACAT[C/G]TC 85 TGAAGAACGTATGAATTACATAA GBA 2629 rs2990226 GAATCCCAACCCCGACGCTCGTCGCC[C/G]G 86 GCTCCGTGAATGTTTGTCACATGT GBA 2629 rs2990225 GCGAATCCCAACCCCGACGCTCGTCG[C/T]CG 87 GGCTCCGTGAATGTTTGTCACAT GBA 2629 rs2990224 TGGGCAGAAGTCAGGGTCCAAAGAAA[G/T]G 88 GCAAAGAAAAGTGTcagtggctca ASPA 443 rs63751297 TAAGAAAGACGTTTTTGATTTTTTTC[A/G]GA 89 CTTCTCTGGCTCCACTACCCTGC ASPA 443 rs62071301 CTGATTCCTGGCCAGGAGCGGTGGCT[C/T]AC 90 GCCTGTAATCCCAGCGCTTTGGG ASPA 443 rs62071300 TAAAAATGCTGATTCCTGGCCAGGAG[C/T]GG 91 TGGCTCACGCCTGTAATCCCAGC ASPA 443  rs62071299 TTTAAAAATGCTGATTCCTGGCCAGG[A/C]GC 92 GGTGGCTCACGCCTGTAATCCCA ASPA 443  rs62071297 CAAGACCTGTCAAAGATCTGAGAAAT[A/T]TT 93 ACCCGACTTACAAGCTAACCATT ASPA 443  rs61697033 ACTGTAATAAGTGCTGTAAAAGAAAT[A/G]C 94 ACAAAATAATATAGCAGAGGGTAT ASPA 443  rs60743592 CTTGAGGTCAGGAGTTCAAGACCAGT[C/T]TG 95 GGCAACATGGGGAAAACCTTGTC ASPA 443  rs60666840 AGGTTGCAGTGAGCCGAGATCATGCC[A/G]TT 96 GCACTCCAGCCGGGGCAACAAAA ASPA 443  rs60147514 ACAAGTGTCTTGAAATTATCTGTGAT[C/T]TG 97 CTATAGAGCAATACTTTTGTAAA ASPA 443  rs59930743 GTGGGTATATGCAGCTCTATGCACTA[C/T]CT 98 GCTCATTTATTTGGTAAATCTAA ASPA 443  rs59690349 TGTGTGTGTGTGCGTGTGTGTGTGTG[-/T 99 GTGTGTG]ATCATAAGAGTGGCTGCAGCAA ACT ASPA 443  rs59676360 AGTCTGGAGTGCAATGGTGCAATCTC[A/G]GC 100 TCACTGCAGCCTCCACCTCCGGG ASPA 443  rs59335404 CTCCTAATGGATATTTCCTAAATTTT[G/T]CTG 101 AACAGAATTTAACTTGAGCTGG ASPA 443  rs58879097 ATTTAAAAATGGATTTCTAGAAAAAC[A/G]AT 102 CACATACTTGAATATTTTAGCAA ASPA 443  rs58686774 CTATAAATGGGTAGCATGAGGGATTC[A/G]A 103 GGAGGTGGCTGAAAGAAGCACGTA ASPA 443  rs57511162 AAGAAACCAAGCATAGTAGAGTGTTA[A/G]A 104 AAACCAAAGCAACTAAACAACTGT ASPA 443  rs55859596 CGGGGCTCAGAACTTGTAACAGAAAA[A/T]T 105 AAAATATACTCCACTCAAGGGAAT ASPA 443  rs55742972 TACTACACTTCACGGATACTGTACTT[-/G 106 TACTT]TTTTTCCAAATTGAAGGTTTTTGGC ASPA 443  rs55640436 TTGTTTTTGTTTTTGTTTTTGTTTTT[-/G 107 TTTTTGTTTTT]TGAGATGGAGTCTCGCTCT GTCGCC ASPA 443  rs36225687 TTTGCCTTACTACACTTCACGGATAC[-/T 108 GTACT]TGTACTTTTTTTCCAAATTGAAGGT ASPA 443  rs36051310 GAGGTGGCTGAAAGAAGCACGTATCC[-/C] 109 TGATGGCATGGTTGCGGGTTATATG ASPA 443  rs36034906 GAGAAAAGCAGTTCCTGGAACACCCC[-/C] 110 ACCCCTTAACCCCTTATCTCTGCTT ASPA 443  rs36033666 TTACATATGTATACATGTGCCATGTT[-/T] 111 GGTGTGCCGCACCCATTAACTCGTC ASPA 443  rs35730123 CTTTTTCCAGATTTTTTTTTTTTTTT[-/T] 112 GAGACAGAGTTTCACTCTTGTTGCC ASPA 443  rs35629100 TTTGGAAATCTTAAGCTTTTATTTGG[-/G] 113 TGTCACAGAGAAACAGGATCTGTAT ASPA 443  rs35614631 TACTTTAAGTTTTAGGGTACATGTGC[-/A] 114 CCATGTGCAGGTTTGTTACATATGT ASPA 443  rs35225782 ATTCATGACCAGCCACATAAATGCAC[-/A] 115 GTATTACTTCGCAAGCATGCCAATG ASPA 443  rs35178659 GTGCACTAGAATTAGCTAAAGTGGGG[-/G] 116 AAAAAAAGATGCATTTGATGGTCTA ASPA 443  rs35095578 AACCTCCACCTCCCAGGTTCAAGAGA[-/A] 117 TTCTCCTGCCTCAGCCTCCCAAGTA ASPA 443  rs35002210 CCTCCCTGTGATCCGAAGTAGCAGAC[A/G]TA 118 CTTAACTTCCATGGTGGATTGTT ASPA 443  rs34744839 AAAACATTATTATATCTAGAAAAAAA[-/A] 119 TGTATCTTAACCATTGTGGGAAGTG ASPA 443  rs34680506 TTGAAGGTAAAATCATAGGGAGTTGG[-/G] 120 AGCTGTCCTCTTGCGCTGAATCAGT ASPA 443  rs34365618 ACTTGTGGCCTTTTTGGAGAGGTTAG[-/CA] 121 ACTCTGAAAACTCTGTCCCTGGACC ASPA 443  rs34275920 GAAGGAGAAAAAGAGAGGAAATAAGT[-/T] 122 AAAATAATAAACACAATTAATAAAG ASPA 443  rs34109510 TGTATACATGTGCCATGTTGGTGTGC[C/T]GC 123 ACCCATTAACTCGTCATTTAGCA ASPA 443  rs34054576 TCACCTGTCACCTCCTATAGAACTTT[-/C] 124 CCCTGACCCTCCTCTATAGCATTAA ASPA 443  rs34015272 ATAAATGATCATCATTCACAGTAGGG[-/G] 125 TTTTGTTTTGTTTTTTTTCTGGAAA ASPA 443 rs34002091 ACAGACATATCTACAAACACACTTTT[-/T] 126 CACATATTTGTGTAAGTCATTTATG ASPA 443 rs28940574 AAAGACAACTAAACTAACGCTCAATG[A/C]A 127 AAAAGTATTCGCTGCTGTTTACAT ASPA 443 rs28940279 TACCGTGTACCCCGTGTTTGTGAATG[A/C]GG 128 CCGCATATTACGAAAAGAAAGAA ASPA 443 rs17850703 CAGGGCTGGAGGTAAAACCATTTATT[A/G]CT 129 AACCCCAGAGCAGTGAAGAAGTG ASPA 443 rs17222495 TTCTTCATTGCCTATTGAAGAGAGAG[C/T]GG 130 AATGCTTTGGTTGCCAGATATGG ASPA 443 rs17175228 CACAAGATCTCATTACTCAGGAGCTG[C/T]CC 131 AAGTGTCTAATGTACTTAGTTAA ASPA 443 rs16953074 TTCTGTGTAACATTTCATTTAAGCAA[A/G]GG 132 ATTCGGCAAATCAAAAATTGTCA ASPA 443 rs16953070 TAAAACGTATTGAAGGTATTATTGAC[G/T]CT 133 GTTGAAGCAAAGAGAACAAAACA HEXA 3073 rs62022858 ATCTGCTCTTCCAGTTGGATGACAAG[C/T]CT 134 TGCTGTCTAACACCTGCTGCAGA HEXA 3073 rs62022857 CCATTTTTTGTTGTATTTTTTTTTTC[C/T]TGAA 135 TACTTTTTATCGCAGTTGGTT HEXA 3073 rs62017872 CCCTGTCTCTAAAAGAAAAAAAAAAA[A/G]A 136 AAAAAAAAAGAAAACAAAACCCAA HEXA 3073 rs62017871 AGTGGCTCCAAAAAGGTCATGGAACC[C/T]CT 137 TGAGGATGATGCAAATTGACTCT HEXA 3073 rs61662730 TAAAGTTACTTTTCTTTTATTGACTT[C/T]CCC 138 TTATTTTTTAACCTTATGCTTT HEXA 3073 rs61329913 CAGAGTTAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA[-/A] 139 GGAAGTAGCAGCAACAGCTTGGAAA HEXA 3073 rs60920713 GTTGCCCAGGGTTGAGTGCAGAGGCA[C/T]AT 140 TTGGCTCACAGCAACCTCTGCC HEXA 3073 rs60783213 AAGGCTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT[-/T 141 TTT]GAGACAGAGTCTTGCTGTGTCACCC HEXA 3073 rs60644867 GCCTACATTCTGCAAAGAGGAGGGAA[C/G]A 142 TTCACAGCTCCATACTTGAACCCT HEXA 3073 rs60288568 CCAAAGGAGAATAGCTCTAGGGGAGG[C/G]A 143 GGTGGATGAGTATGCATGGGGGAG HEXA 3073 rs59888548 GACTCCATCTCAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA[-/A] 144 TGCAGTCTAATGGCAGAATTAGACT HEXA 3073 rs59733856 TTATTTATTTATTTATTTATTTTTGA[A/G]ACA 145 GGGTCTCTGTTGTCCAGGCTGG HEXA 3073 rs59427837 TTTTGAGGCAGGGTCTCACTCTGTTG[C/T]CC 146 AGGGTTGAGTGCAGAGGCACATC HEXA 3073 rs59171976 CGCCTTGCGAAGGCCCCACAGCTTGC[C/T]TG 147 TGACAAACGTTCATAGGCAAATG HEXA 3073 rs58706602 GGAGGTCTGTACAAAGCACCACCTAC[C/T]TC 148 ATGGGTCAGTTTCCACAGCAGAA HEXA 3073 rs58696963 GAATCTTATAATTCACTGTGTACCTC[-/C 149 CTC]TGTTTCATATTTTCGCAATTGAACT HEXA 3073 rs58610850 AACATAGTATCTAATATAGCTTTACA[C/T]CC 150 AAAGCCAAAATATGAATACACTG HEXA 3073 rs58016062 TTGTTTTGTTTTGTTTGGGGGGGGGG[-/G] 151 TTGTTTTTCTGAGAGGGAGTCTTGC HEXA 3073 rs57733983 CATACCAAAGGGCAGCTGGAGGGATAC[C/T]A 152 GACGGAAGTCATGTGGAGAGTGAA HEXA 3073 rs57476645 CAGGTGTGAGCCACCACGACCACCAA[A/T]T 153 TAGCTCTTTTTACTCCTTCCCTTC HEXA 3073 rs56870003 AGTGGTAGCTGATTTTGCTTCTGGAT[A/C]CT 154 TTGCCACCTTCCCACTCTTTAAT HEXA 3073 rs56338339 AAAGACCTGTTTCTTAAAAAAAAAAA[-/A 155 GAAAAAAAAAAA]GAAAGAAAAGAAAAG AAAAAAACAG HEXA 3073 rs55995352 TAAAAAATCTTTCAATGAGGAGATGT[C/T]CC 156 CAGAGCAAGACAGCTGTAGGATG HEXA 3073 rs55860138 AAAAGAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA[-/A] 157 GAAAACAAAACCCAAACCCATAAAG HEXA 3073 rs55743646 CCTGTCTCTAAAAGAAAAAAAAAAAA[A/G]A 158 AAAAAAAAGAAAACAAAACCCAAA HEXA 3073 rs55665666 GTTATCATAGAAAAATATCACACTCT[-/GT] 159 CTGTATCCCCACTTCCAGAAACTGT HEXA 3073 rs36106892 CAGGAGCTCATAGAATTACATACAAT[-/C] 160 TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTGAGACAGCG HEXA 3073 rs36091525 TTGAGAATCTTATAATTCACTGTGTA[-/C 161 CTC]CCTCTGTTTCATATTTTCGCAATTG HEXA 3073 rs35949555 CCACTACCACAGTGCCTAGAGAACAA[C/T]A 162 TGTGTTTAATAATATTTAAATAAT HEXA 3073 rs35827424 CCCTGTCTCTAAAAGAAAAAAAAAAA[-/A] 163 AAAAAAAAAAGAAAACAAAACCCAA HEXA 3073 rs35729578 CCATTATATCATTCATTTCCCACTCA[-/T] 164 TTTCTTCATTCCAACCAAGATATAT HEXA 3073 rs35649102 TCCGTCTCAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAG[-/A] 165 GAAAGGAATTATTCTCATGTATACA HEXA 3073 rs35118677 CTGGGGCAGTTAAAAAGAAAAACAAA[-/C] 166 CCCTGGTCCCTGCCCTTGAGGAGAT HEXA 3073 rs35005352 CTCCAGGGTCCCATTCCAGGACCACA[-/C] 167 GCCTGCTACCTCTGCAGCTCACTCA HEXA 3073 rs34736306 GGATTGACATATACCAGTTAGACGGA[-/T] 168 TTTTTTTTTCCATAAACCAGGCTCA HEXA 3073 rs34607939 ACAAATAATTACTACATATCTACAAC[A/G]TT 169 CCAGATACAGAAGAAATGGCCAA HEXA 3073 rs34496117 TAAACACACTTGAAACATCATATAAA[-/A 170 TG]ATATTACTACAAGACTTAACCGTAA HEXA 3073 rs34300017 ACACAGGTAATCCATGTTTATTATAG[-/A] 171 AAAATGCCACATTACTCTTTATTGA HEXA 3073 rs34206496 AGTTATCATAGAAAAATATCACACTC[-/TG] 172 TCTGTATCCCCACTTCCAGAAACTG HEXA 3073 rs34110830 AATGAACTTACAGGAAGGTAATATAT[-/G] 173 GGAAATAAACATCTTATTGAATTTA HEXA 3073 rs34093438 GGACCCCTGAAAGGCACAAGACACCC[-/T] 174 TTCAGGTTCACACTTCCTGAAAGCT HEXA 3073 rs34085965 CCACCAATCACCAGAGCCTTCTGCTC[A/G]GG 175 GGTACCTGAGGGAAAACAAGCAA HEXA 3073 rs34004907 AAAGACTGAAAAAACATTCATAACTA[-/T] 176 TTTTCTTGTTATCCTCGGAAATGTC HEXA 3073 rs28942072 TATCTTCATCTTGGAGGAGATGAGGT[C/T]GA 177 TTTCACCTGCTGGAAGTCCAACC HEXA 3073 rs28942071 TTGCCTATGAACGTTTGTCACACTTC[C/T]GCT 178 GTGAGTTGCTGAGGCGAGGTGT HEXA 3073 rs28941771 GCTTGCTGTTGGATACATCTCGCCAT[C/T]AC 179 CTGCCACTCTCTAGCATCCTGGA HEXA 3073 rs28941770 CCGGGGCTTGCTGTTGGATACATCTC[G/T]CC 180 ATTACCTGCCACTCTCTAGCATC

3. Nucleic Acid Target Length Evaluation:

In some embodiments, aspects of the invention relate to methods for detecting nucleic acid deletions or insertions in regions containing nucleic acid sequence repeats.

Genomic regions that contain nucleic acid sequence repeats are often the site of genetic instability due to the amplification or contraction of the number of sequence repeats (e.g., the insertion or deletion of one or more units of the repeated sequence). Instability in the length of genomic regions that contain high numbers of repeat sequences has been associated with a number of hereditary and non hereditary diseases and conditions.

For example, “Fragile X syndrome, or Martin-Bell syndrome, is a genetic syndrome which results in a spectrum of characteristic physical, intellectual, emotional and behavioral features which range from severe to mild in manifestation. The syndrome is associated with the expansion of a single trinucleotide gene sequence (CGG) on the X chromosome, and results in a failure to express the FMR-1 protein which is required for normal neural development. There are four generally accepted forms of Fragile X syndrome which relate to the length of the repeated CGG sequence; Normal (29-31 CGG repeats), Premutation (55-200 CGG repeats), Full Mutation (more than 200 CGG repeats), and Intermediate or Gray Zone Alleles (40-60 repeats).”

Other examples include cancer, which has been associated with microsatellite instability (MSI) involving an increase or decrease in the genomic copy number of nucleic acid repeats at one or more microsatellite loci (e.g., BAT-25 and/or BAT-26). The are currently many sequencing-based assays for determining the number of nucleic acid sequence repeats at a particular locus and identifying the presence of nucleic acid insertions or deletions. However, such techniques are not useful in a high throughput multiplex analysis where the entire length of a region may not be sequenced.

In contrast, in some embodiments, aspects of the invention relate to detecting the presence of an insertion or deletion at a genomic locus without requiring the locus to be sequenced (or without requiring the entire locus to be sequenced). Aspects of the invention are particularly useful for detecting an insertion or deletion in a nucleic acid region that contains high levels of sequence repeats. The presence of sequence repeats at a genetic locus is often associated with relatively high levels of polymorphism in a population due to insertions or deletions of one or more of the sequence repeats at the locus. The polymorphisms can be associated with diseases or predisposition to diseases (e.g., certain polymorphic alleles are recessive alleles associated with a disease or condition). However, the presence of sequence repeats often complicates the analysis of a genetic locus and increases the risk of errors when using sequencing techniques to determine the precise sequence and number of repeats at that locus.

In some embodiments, aspects of the invention relate to determining the size of a genetic locus by evaluating the capture frequency of a portion of that locus suspected of containing an insertion or deletion (e.g., due to the presence of sequence repeats) using a nucleic acid capture technique (e.g., a nucleic acid sequence capture technique based on molecular inversion probe technology). According to aspects of the invention, a statistically significant difference in capture efficiency for a genetic locus of interest in different biological samples (e.g., from different subjects) is indicative of different relative lengths in those samples. It should be appreciated that the length differences may be at one or both alleles of the genetic locus. Accordingly, aspects of the invention may be used to identify polymorphisms regardless of whether biological samples being interrogated at heterozygous or homozygous for the polymorphisms. According to aspects of the invention, subjects that contain one or more loci with an insertion or deletion can be identified by analyzing capture efficiencies for nucleic acids obtained from one or more biological samples using appropriate controls (e.g., capture efficiencies for known nucleic acid sizes, capture efficiencies for other regions that are not suspected of containing an insertion or deletion in the biological sample(s), or predetermined reference capture efficiencies, or any combination thereof. However, it should be appreciated that aspects of the invention are not limited by the nature or presence of the control. In some embodiments, if a statistically significant variation in capture efficiency is detected, a subject may be identified as being at risk for a disease or condition associated with insertions or deletions at that genetic locus. In some embodiments, the subject may be analyzed in greater detail in order to determine the precise nature of the insertion or deletion and whether the subject is heterozygous or homozygous for one or more insertions or deletions. For example, gel electrophoresis of an amplification (e.g., PCR) product of the locus, or Southern blotting, or any combination thereof can be used as an orthogonal approach to verify the length of the locus. In some embodiments, a more exhaustive and detailed sequence analysis of the locus can be performed to identify the number and types of insertions and deletions. However, other techniques may be used to further analyze a locus identified as having an abnormal length according to aspects of the invention.

Accordingly, aspects of the invention relate to detecting abnormal nucleic acid lengths in genomic regions of interest. In some embodiments, the invention aims to estimate the size of genomic regions that are hard to be accessed, such as repetitive elements. However, it should be appreciated that methods of the invention do not require that the precise length be estimated. In some embodiments, it is sufficient to determine that one or more alleles with abnormal lengths are present at a locus of interest (e.g., based on the detection of abnormal capture efficiencies).

In a non-limiting example, fragile X can be used to illustrate aspects of the invention where the size of trinucleotide repeats (genotype) is linked to a symptom (phenotype). However, it should be appreciated that fragile X is a non-limiting example and similar analyses may be performed for other genetic loci (e.g., independently or simultaneously in multiplex analyses).

Use of molecular inversion probes (MIPs) has been demonstrated for detection of single nucleotide polymorphisms (Hardenbol et al. 2005 Genome Res 15:269-75) and for preparative amplification of large sets of exons (Porreca et al. 2007 Nat Methods 4:931-6, Krishnakumar et al. 2008 Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:9296-301). In both cases, oligonucleotide probes are designed which have ends (‘targeting arms’) that hybridize up-stream and down-stream of the locus that is to be amplified.

In some embodiments, aspects of the invention are based on the recognition that the effect of length on probe capturing efficiency can be used in the context of an assay (e.g., a high throughput and/or multiplex assay) to allow the length of sequences to be determined without requiring sequencing of the entire region being evaluated. This is particularly useful for repeat regions that are prone to changes in size. As illustrated in FIG. 8 , which is reproduced from Deng et al., Nature Biotech. 27:353-60, (see Supplemental FIG. 1G of Deng et al.,) illustrates that shorter sequences are captured with higher efficiency that longer sequences using MIPs. The statistical package R and its effects module were used for this analysis. A linear model was used, and each individual factor was assumed to be independent. The dashed lines represent a 95% confidence interval. Shorter target sequences were captured with higher efficiency than long target sequences (p<2×10⁻¹⁶). However, the use of this differential capture efficiency for systematic sequence length analysis was not previously recognized.

In some embodiments, following probe hybridization, polymerase fill-in and ligation reactions are performed to convert the hybridized probe to a covalently-closed, circular molecule containing the desired target. PCR or rolling circle amplification plus exonuclease digestion of non-circularized material is performed to isolate and amplify the circular targets from the starting nucleic acid pool. Since one of the main benefits of the method is the potential for a high degree of multiplexing, generally thousands of targets are captured in a single reaction containing thousands of probes.

According to aspects of the invention, repetitive regions are surrounded by non repetitive unique sequences, which can be used to amplify the repeat-containing regions using, for example, PCR or padlock (MIP)-based method.

In addition to the repetitive regions, a probe (e.g., a MIP or padlock probe) can be designed to include at least a sequence that is sufficient to be uniquely identified in the genome (or target pool). After the probe is circularized and amplified, the amplicon can be end-sequenced so that the unique sequence can be identified and served as the “representative” of the repetitive region as illustrated in FIG. 9 . FIG. 9 illustrates a non-limiting scheme of padlock (MIP) capture of a region that includes both repetitive regions (thick wavy line) and the adjacent unique sequence (thick strait line). The regions of the probe are indicated with the targeting arms shown as regions “1” and “3.” An intervening region that may be, or include, a sequencing primer binding site is shown as “2.” After the padlock is circularized and amplified, it can be end-sequenced to obtain the sequence of the unique sequence, which represents the repetitive region of interest.

Although capturing efficiency is overall negatively correlated with target length, different probe sequences may have unique features. Therefore, multiple probes could be designed and tested so that an optimal one is chosen to be sensitive enough to differentiate repetitive sizes of roughly 0-150 bp, 150-600 bp, and beyond, which represent normal, premutation and full mutation of fragile X syndrome, respectively. However, it should be appreciated that other probe sizes and sequences can be designed, and optionally optimized, to distinguish a range of repeat region size differences (e.g., length differences of about 3-30 bases, about 30-60 bases, about 60-90 bases, about 90-120 bases, about 120-150 bases, about 150-300 bases, about 300-600 bases, about 600-900 bases, or any intermediate or longer length difference). It should be appreciated that a length difference may be an increase in size or a decrease in size.

In some embodiments, an initial determination of an unexpected capture frequency is indicative of the presence of size difference. In some embodiments, an increase in capture frequency is indicative of a deletion. In some embodiments, a decrease in capture frequency is indicative of an insertion. However, it should be appreciated that depending on specific sequence parameters and the relative sizes of the capture probes, the target region, and the deletions or insertions, a change in capture frequency can be associated with either an increase or decrease in target region length. In some embodiments, the precise nature of the change can be determined using one or more additional techniques as described herein.

Accordingly, in some aspects a MIP probe includes a linear nucleic acid strand that contains two hybridization sequences or targeting arms, one at each end of the linear probe, wherein each of the hybridization sequences is complementary to a separate sequence on a the same strand of a target nucleic acid, and wherein these sequences on the target nucleic acid flank the two ends of the target nucleic acid sequence of interest. It should be appreciated that upon hybridization, the two ends of the probe are inverted with respect to each other in the sense that both 5′ and 3′ ends of the probe hybridize to the same strand to separate regions flanking the target region (as illustrated in FIG. 9 for example).

In some embodiments, the hybridization sequences are between about 10-100 nucleotides long, for example between about 10-30, about 30-60, about 60-90, or about 20, about 30, about 40, or about 50 nucleotides long. However, other lengths may be used depending on the application. In some embodiments, the hybridization Tms of both targeting arms of a probe are designed or selected to be similar. In some embodiments, the hybridization Tms of the targeting arms of a plurality of probes designed to capture different target regions are selected or designed to be similar so that they can be used together in a multiplex reaction. Accordingly, a typical size of a MIP probe prior to fill in is about 60-80 nucleotides long. However, other sizes can be used depending on the sizes of the targeting arms and any other sequences (e.g., primer binding or tag sequences) that are present in the MIP probe. In some embodiments, MIP probes are designed to avoid sequence-dependent secondary structures. In some embodiments, MIP probes are designed such that the targeting arms do not overlap with known polymorphic regions. In some embodiments, targeting arms that can be used for capturing the repeat region of the Fragile X locus can have the following sequences or complementary to these sequences depending on the strand that is captured.

-   -   left: CTCCUITYCGGTITCACTTC (SEQ ID NO: 181)     -   right: ATCTTCTCTTCAGCCCTGCT (SEQ ID NO: 182)

The typical captured size using these targeting arms is about 100 nucleotides in length (e.g., about 30 repeats of a tri-nucleotide repeat).

In some embodiments, the number of reads obtained for the “representative” of the repetitive region is not informative to estimate the target length because it is dependent on the total number of reads obtained. To overcome this, it is useful to include one or more probes that target other “control” regions where no or minimal polymorphism exists among populations. Because of the systematic consistency of capturing efficiency (see, e.g., FIG. 9 ), the ratio of reads obtained for the repetitive “representative” to reads obtained for the control region(s) will be tuned using DNA with defined numbers of repeats. Ultimately, the ratio can serve as a measure of the repeat length as illustrated in FIG. 10 . FIG. 10 illustrates a non-limiting hypothetical relationship between target gap size and the relative number of reads of the repetitive region, which is measured by the ratio of the repeat “representative” reads vs. the “control” region reads. The unit of y-axis is arbitrary.

In some embodiments, to better tell targets with similar size range apart, the whole repetitive region can be sequenced by making a shotgun library (e.g., by making a shotgun library from a captured sequence, for example a sequence captured using a MIP probe). The longer the repeat is, the more short reads of repeats will be obtained. Therefore, the target length will contribute twice to the relative number of “repetitive” reads, which will gain better resolution of differentiating targets. In some embodiments, the expectation is that the number of reads from any given repeat will be a direct function of the number of repeats present. However, in some embodiments, a Poisson sampling induced spread may need to be considered and in some embodiments may be sufficiently large to limit the resolution.

When a precise measurement of the length of both alleles from a diploid sample is desired, further manipulations may be required. This is because the capture efficiency measured will actually be the average efficiency of the two alleles. To effectively achieve separate measurements for each allele, barcodes (e.g., sequence tags) can be used that allow the efficiency of individual capture events (from individual genomic loci) to be followed. FIG. 11A-C shows the approach. For a given locus, MIPs are synthesized to contain one of a large number differentiator tags in their backbone such that the probability of any two MIPs in a reaction having the same differentiator tag sequence is low. MIP capture is performed on the sample; the reaction will be biased for shorter target lengths, and therefore the reaction product will be comprised of more ‘short’ circles than ‘long’ circles. Each circle should bear a unique differentiator tag sequence. Then, linear RCA (1RCA) is performed on the circles. In the 1RCA reaction, circles are converted into long, linear concatemers of themselves. The 1RCA reaction for a given circle stops when the concatemer has reached a ‘fixed’ length (based on the processivity/error rate of the polymerase). Concatemers derived from smaller circles will therefore contain more copies of the differentiator tag, and concatemers derived from larger circles will contain fewer copies of the differentiator tag. The number of each differentiator tag sequence is counted, for example, by next-generation sequencing.

When number of occurrences is plotted against differentiator tag ID, the data will naturally cluster into two groups reflecting the lengths of the two alleles in the diploid sample. The allele lengths can therefore be read directly off this graph, after absolute length calibration using known standards. In some embodiments, a sequencing technique (e.g., a next-generation sequencing technique) is used to sequence part of one or more captured targets (e.g., or amplicons thereof) and the sequences are used to count the number of different barcodes that are present. Accordingly, in some embodiments, aspects of the invention relate to a highly-multiplexed qPCR reaction.

Other non-limiting examples of loci at which insertions or deletions or repeat sequences may be associated with a disease or condition are provided in Tables 3 and 4. It should be appreciated that the presence of an abnormal length at any one or more of these loci may be evaluated according to aspects of the invention. In some embodiments, two or more of these loci or other loci may be evaluated in a single multiplex reaction using different probes designed to hybridize under the same reaction conditions to different target nucleic acid in a biological sample.

TABLE 3 Polyglutamine (PolyQ) Diseases Normal/ Type Gene wildtype Pathogenic DRPLA ATN1 or 6-35 49-88 (Dentatorubropallidoluysian DRPLA atrophy) HD (Huntington's disease) HTT 10-35  35+ (Huntingtin) SBMA (Spinobulbar Androgen 9-36 38-62 muscular atrophy or Kennedy receptor disease) on the X chromosome. SCA1 (Spinocerebellar ataxia ATXN1 6-35 49-88 Type 1) SCA2 (Spinocerebellar ataxia ATXN2 14-32  33-77 Type 2) SCA3 (Spinocerebellar ataxia ATXN3 12-40  55-86 Type 3 or Machado-Joseph disease) SCA6 (Spinocerebellar ataxia CACNA1A 4-18 21-30 Type 6) SCA7 (Spinocerebellar ataxia ATXN7 7-17  38-120 Type 7) SCA17 (Spinocerebellar TBP 25-42  47-63 ataxia Type 17)

TABLE 4 Non-Polyglutamine Diseases Normal/ Type Gene Codon wildtype Pathogenic FRAXA FMR1, on the X- CGG 6-53 230+ (Fragile X chromosome syndrome) FXTAS (Fragile FMR1, on the X- CGG 6-53  55-200 X-associated chromosome tremor/ataxia syndrome) FRAXE AFF2 or FMR2, GCC 6-35 200+ (Fragile XE on the X- mental chromosome retardation) FRDA FXN or X25, GAA 7-34 100+ (Friedreich's (frataxin) ataxia) DM (Myotonic DMPK CTG 5-37  50+ dystrophy) SCA8 OSCA or SCA8 CTG 16-37  110-250 (Spinocerebellar ataxia Type 8) SCA12 PPP2R2B or CAG 7-28 66-78 (Spinocerebellar SCA12 On ataxia Type 12) 5′ end

The following examples illustrate aspects and embodiments of the invention and are not intended to be limiting or restrictive. Many variations of the invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art upon review of this specification. The full scope of the invention should be determined by reference to the claims, along with their full scope of equivalents, and the specification, along with such variations.

4. Increasing Detection Sensitivity:

In some embodiments, aspects of the invention relate to methods for increasing the sensitivity of nucleic acid detection assays.

There are currently many genomic assays that utilize next-generation (e.g., polony-based) sequencing to generate data, including genome resequencing, RNA-seq for gene expression, bisulphite sequencing for methylation, and Immune-seq, among others. In order to make quantitative measurements (including genotype calling), these methods utilize the counts of sequencing reads of a given genomic locus as a proxy for the representation of that sequence in the original sample of nucleic acids. The majority of these techniques require a preparative step to construct a high-complexity library of DNA molecules that is representative of a sample of interest. Current assays use one of several alternative nucleic acid preparative techniques (e.g., amplification, for example PCR-based amplification; sequence-specific capture, for example, using immobilized capture probes; or target capture into a circularized probe followed by a sequence analysis step. In order to reduce errors associated with the unpredictability (stochastic nature) of nucleic acid isolation and sequence analysis techniques, current methods involve oversampling a target nucleic acid preparation in order to increase the likelihood that all sequences that are present in the original nucleic acid sample will be represented in the final sequence data. For example, a genomic sequencing library may contain an over- or under-representation of particular sequences from a source nucleic acid sample (e.g., genome preparation) as a result of stochastic variations in the library construction process. Such variations can be particularly problematic when they result in target sequences from a genome being absent or undetectable in a sequencing library. For example, an under-representation of particular allelic sequences (e.g., heterozygotic alleles) from a genome in a sequencing library can result in an apparent homozygous representation in a sequencing library.

In contrast, aspects of the invention relate to basing a nucleic acid sequence analysis on results from two or more different nucleic acid preparatory techniques that have different systematic biases in the types of nucleic acids that they sample rather than simply oversampling the target nucleic acid. According to some embodiments, different techniques have different sequence biases that are systematic and not simply due to stochastic effects during nucleic acid capture or amplification. Accordingly, in some embodiments, the degree of oversampling required to overcome variations in nucleic acid preparation needs to be sufficient to overcome the biases. In some embodiments, the invention provides methods that reduce the need for oversampling by combining nucleic acid and/or sequence results obtained from two or more different nucleic acid preparative techniques that have different biases.

According to the invention, different techniques have different characteristic or systematic biases. For example, one technique may bias a sample analysis towards one particular allele at a genetic locus of interest, whereas a different technique would bias the sample analysis towards a different allele at the same locus. Accordingly, the same sample may be identified as being different depending on the type of technique that is used to prepare nucleic acid for sequence analysis. This effectively represents a sensitivity issue, because each technique has a different relative sensitivities for polymorphic sequences of interest.

According to aspects of the invention, the sensitivity of a nucleic acid analysis can be increased by combining the sequences from different nucleic acid preparative steps and using the combined sequence information for a diagnostic assay (e.g., for a making a call as to whether a subject is homozygous or heterozygous at a genetic locus of interest).

Currently, the ability of DNA sequencing to detect mutations is limited by the ability of the upstream sample isolation (e.g., by amplification, immobilization enrichment, circularization capture, etc.) methods to reliably isolate the locus of interest.

If one wishes to make heterozygote base-calls for a diploid genome (e.g. a human sample presented for molecular diagnostic sequencing), it is important in some embodiments that the isolation method produces near- or perfectly-uniform amounts of the two alleles to be sequenced (at least sufficiently uniform to be “called” unambiguously as a heterozygote or a homozygote for a locus of interest).

Sample preparative methods may fall into three classes: 1) single- or several target amplification (e.g., uniplex PCR, ‘multiplex’ PCR), 2) multi-target hybridization enrichment (e.g., Agilent SureSelect ‘hybrid capture’ [Gnirke et al 2009, Nature methods 27:182-9], Roche/Nimblegen ‘sequence capture’ [Hodges et al 2007, Nature genetics 39:1522-7], and 3) multi-target circularization selection (e.g. molecular inversion probes or padlock probes, [Porreca et al 2007, Nature methods 4:931-6, Turner et al 2009, Nature methods 6:315-6], ‘selectors’ [Dahl et al 2005, Nucleic acids research 33:e71]). Each of these methods can result in a pool of isolated product that does not adequately represent the input abundance distribution. For example, the two alleles at a heterozygous position can become skewed far from their input 50:50 ratio to something that results in a missed basecall during downstream sequencing. For example, if the ratio was skewed from 50:50 to 10:90, and the sample was sequenced to 10×average coverage, there is a high probability that one of the two alleles would not be observed once in the ten sequencing reads. This would reduce the sensitivity of the sequencing method by converting a heterozygous position to homozygous (where potentially the ‘mutant’ allele was the one not observed). In some embodiments, a skewed ratio is a particular issue that decreases the sensitivity of detecting mutations present in a heterogeneous tumor tissue. For example, if only 10% of the cells analyzed in a heterogeneous sample harbored a heterozygous mutation, the mutation would be expected to be present in 5% of sequence reads, not 50%. In this scenario, the need for robust, sensitive detection may be even more acute.

The methods disclosed herein are based, in part, on the discovery that certain classes of isolation methods have different modes of bias. The disclosure provide methods for increasing the sensitivity of the downstream sequencing by using a combination of multiple isolation methods (e.g., one or more from at least two of the classes disclosed herein) for a sample. This is particularly important in molecular diagnostics where high sensitivity is required to minimize the chances of ‘missing’ a disease-associated mutation. For example, given a nominal false-negative error rate of 1×10⁻³ for sequencing following circularization selection, and a false-negative error rate of 1×10⁻³ for sequencing following hybridization enrichment, one can achieve a final false-negative rate of 1×10⁻⁶ by performing both techniques on the sample (assuming failures in each method are fully independent). For a recessive disease with carrier frequency of 0.1, caused by a single fully-penetrant mutant allele, the number of missed carrier diagnoses would decrease from 1000 per million patients tested to 1 per million patients tested. Furthermore, if the testing was used in the context of prenatal carrier screening, the number of affected children born as a result of missing the carrier call in one parent would decrease from 25 per million to 25 per billion born.

Additionally, the disclosure provides combinations of preparative methods to effectively increase sequencing coverage in regions containing disease-associated alleles. Since heterozygote error rate is largely tied to both deviations from 50:50 allele representation, and in the case of next-generation DNA sequencing deviations from average abundance (such that less abundant isolated targets are more likely to be undersampled at one or both alleles), selectively increasing coverage in these regions will also selectively increase sensitivity. Furthermore, MIPs that detect presence or absence of specific known disease-associated mutations can be used to increase sensitivity selectively. In some embodiments, these MIPs would have a targeting arm whose 3′-most region is complementary to the expected mutation, and has a fill-in length of 0 or more bp. Thus, the MIP will form only if the mutation is present, and its presence will be detected by sequencing.

Additionally, algorithms disclosed herein may be used to determine base identity with varying levels of stringency depending on whether the given position has any known disease-associated alleles. Stringency can be reduced in such positions by decreasing the minimum number of observed mutant reads necessary to make a consensus base-call. This will effectively increase sensitivity for mutant allele detection at the cost of decreased specificity.

An embodiment of the invention combines MIPs plus hybridization enrichment, plus optionally extra MIPs targeted to specific known, common disease-associated loci, e.g., to detect the presence of a polymorphism in a target nucleic acid. A non-limiting example is illustrated in FIG. 12 that illustrates a schematic using MIPs plus hybridization enrichment, plus optionally extra MIPs targeted to specific known, common disease-associated loci, e.g., to detect the presence of a polymorphism in a target nucleic acid.

FIGS. 13 and 14 illustrate different capture efficiencies for MIP-based captures. FIG. 13 shows a graph of per-target abundance with MIP capture. In this graph, bias largely drives the heterozygote error rate, since targets which are less abundant here are less likely to be covered in sufficient depth during sequencing to adequately sample both alleles. This is from Turner et al 2009, Nature methods 6:315-6. Hybridization enrichment results in a qualitatively similar abundance distribution, but the abundance of a given target is likely not correlated between the two methods. FIG. 14 shows a graph of correlation between two MIP capture reactions from Ball et al 2009, Nature biotechnology 27:361-8. Each point represents the target abundance in replicate 1 and replicate 2. Pearson correlation r=0.956. This indicates that MIP capture reproducibly biases targets to specific abundances. Hybridization enrichment is similarly correlated from one capture to the next.

According to aspects of the invention, such biases can be detected or overcome by systematically combining different capture and/or analytical techniques in an assay that interrogates a plurality of loci in a plurality of subject samples.

Accordingly, it should be appreciated that in any of the embodiments described herein (e.g., tiling/staggering, tagging, size-detection, sensitivity enhancing algorithms, or any combination thereof), aspects of the invention involve preparing genomic nucleic acid and/or contacting them with one or more different probes (e.g., capture probes, hybridization probes, MIPs, others etc.). In some embodiments, the amount of genomic nucleic acid used per subject ranges from 1 ng to 10 micrograms (e.g., 500 ng to 5 micrograms). However, higher or lower amounts (e.g., less than 1 ng, more than 10 micrograms, 10-50 micrograms, 50-100 micrograms or more) may be used. In some embodiments, for each locus of interest, the amount of probe used per assay may be optimized for a particular application. In some embodiments, the ratio (molar ratio, for example measured as a concentration ratio) of probe to genome equivalent (e.g., haploid or diploid genome equivalent, for example for each allele or for both alleles of a nucleic acid target or locus of interest) ranges from 1/100, 1/10, 1/1, 10/1, 100/1, 1000/1. However, lower, higher, or intermediate ratios may be used.

In some embodiments, the amount of target nucleic acid and probe used for each reaction is normalized to avoid any observed differences being caused by differences in concentrations or ratios. In some embodiments, in order to normalize genomic DNA and probe, the genomic DNA concentration is read using a standard spectrophotometer or by fluorescence (e.g., using a fluorescent intercalating dye). The probe concentration may be determined experimentally or using information specified by the probe manufacturer.

Similarly, once a locus has been captured (e.g., on a MIP or other probe or in another form), it may be amplified and/or sequenced in a reaction involving one or more primers. The amount of primer added for each reaction can range from 0.1 pmol to 1 nmol, 0.15 pmol to 1.5 nmol (for example around 1.5 pmol). However, other amounts (e.g., lower, higher, or intermediate amounts) may be used.

In some embodiments, it should be appreciated that one or more intervening sequences (e.g., sequence between the first and second targeting arms on a MIP capture probe), identifier or tag sequences, or other probe sequences that are not designed to hybridize to a target sequence (e.g., a genomic target sequence) should be designed to avoid excessive complementarity (to avoid cross-hybridization) to target sequences or other sequences (e.g., other genomic sequences) that may be in a biological sample. For example, these sequences may be designed have a sufficient number of mismatches with any genomic sequence (e.g., at least 5, 10, 15, or more mismatches out of 30 bases) or as having a Tm (e.g., a mismatch Tm) that is lower (e.g., at least 5, 10, 15, 20, or more degrees C. lower) than the hybridization reaction temperature.

It should be appreciated that a targeting arm as used herein may be designed to hybridize (e.g., be complementary) to either strand of a genetic locus of interest if the nucleic acid being analyzed is DNA (e.g., genomic DNA). However, in the context of MIP probes, whichever strand is selected for one targeting arm will be used for the other one. However, in the context of RNA analysis, it should be appreciated that a targeting arm should be designed to hybridize to the transcribed RNA. It also should be appreciated that MIP probes referred to herein as “capturing” a target sequence are actually capturing it by template-based synthesis rather than by capturing the actual target molecule (other than for example in the initial stage when the arms hybridize to it or in the sense that the target molecule can remain bound to the extended MIP product until it is denatured or otherwise removed).

It should be appreciated that in some embodiments a targeting arm may include a sequence that is complementary to one allele or mutation (e.g., a SNP or other polymorphism, a mutation, etc.) so that the probe will preferentially hybridize (and capture) target nucleic acids having that allele or mutation. However, in many embodiments, each targeting arm is designed to hybridize (e.g., be complementary) to a sequence that is not polymorphic in the subjects of a population that is being evaluated. This allows target sequences to be captured and/or sequenced for all alleles and then the differences between subjects (e.g., calls of heterozygous or homozygous for one or more loci) can be based on the sequence information and/or the frequency as described herein.

It should be appreciated that sequence tags (also referred to as barcodes) may be designed to be unique in that they do not appear at other positions within a probe or a family of probes and they also do not appear within the sequences being targeted. Thus they can be used to uniquely identify (e.g., by sequencing or hybridization properties) particular probes having other characteristics (e.g., for particular subjects and/or for particular loci).

It also should be appreciated that in some embodiments probes or regions of probes or other nucleic acids are described herein as comprising or including certain sequences or sequence characteristics (e.g., length, other properties, etc.). However, it should be appreciated that in some embodiments, any of the probes or regions of probes or other nucleic acids consist of those regions (e.g., arms, central regions, tags, primer sites, etc., or any combination thereof) of consist of those sequences or have sequences with characteristics that consist of one or more characteristics (e.g., length, or other properties, etc.) as described herein in the context of any of the embodiments (e.g., for tiled or staggered probes, tagged probes, length detection, sensitivity enhancing algorithms or any combination thereof).

It should be appreciated that probes, primers, and other nucleic acids designed or used herein may be synthetic, natural, or a combination thereof. Accordingly, as used herein, the term “nucleic acid” refers to multiple linked nucleotides (i.e., molecules comprising a sugar (e.g., ribose or deoxyribose) linked to an exchangeable organic base, which is either a pyrimidine (e.g., cytosine (C), thymidine (T) or uracil (U)) or a purine (e.g., adenine (A) or guanine (G)). “Nucleic acid” and “nucleic acid molecule” may be used interchangeably and refer to oligoribonucleotides as well as oligodeoxyribonucleotides. The terms shall also include polynucleosides (i.e., a polynucleotide minus a phosphate) and any other organic base containing nucleic acid.

The organic bases include adenine, uracil, guanine, thymine, cytosine and inosine. Unless otherwise stated, nucleic acids may be single or double stranded. The nucleic acid may be naturally or non-naturally occurring. Nucleic acids can be obtained from natural sources, or can be synthesized using a nucleic acid synthesizer (i.e., synthetic).

Harvest and isolation of nucleic acids are routinely performed in the art and suitable methods can be found in standard molecular biology textbooks. (See, for example, Maniatis' Handbook of Molecular Biology.) The nucleic acid may be DNA or RNA, such as genomic DNA, mitochondrial DNA, mRNA, cDNA, rRNA, miRNA, or a combination thereof. Non-naturally occurring nucleic acids such as bacterial artificial chromosomes (BACs) and yeast artificial chromosomes (YACs) can also be used.

The invention also contemplates the use of nucleic acid derivatives. As will be described herein, the use of certain nucleic acid derivatives may increase the stability of the nucleic acids of the invention by preventing their digestion, particularly when they are exposed to biological samples that may contain nucleases. As used herein, a nucleic acid derivative is a non-naturally occurring nucleic acid or a unit thereof. Nucleic acid derivatives may contain non-naturally occurring elements such as non-naturally occurring nucleotides and non-naturally occurring backbone linkages.

Nucleic acid derivatives may contain backbone modifications such as but not limited to phosphorothioate linkages, phosphodiester modified nucleic acids, phosphorothiolate modifications, combinations of phosphodiester and phosphorothioate nucleic acid, methylphosphonate, alkylphosphonates, phosphate esters, alkylphosphonothioates, phosphoramidates, carbamates, carbonates, phosphate triesters, acetamidates, carboxymethyl esters, methylphosphorothioate, phosphorodithioate, p-ethoxy, and combinations thereof. The backbone composition of the nucleic acids may be homogeneous or heterogeneous.

Nucleic acid derivatives may contain substitutions or modifications in the sugars and/or bases. For example, they include nucleic acids having backbone sugars which are covalently attached to low molecular weight organic groups other than a hydroxyl group at the 3′ position and other than a phosphate group at the 5′ position (e.g., an 2′-0-alkylated ribose group). Nucleic acid derivatives may include non-ribose sugars such as arabinose. Nucleic acid derivatives may contain substituted purines and pyrimidines such as C-5 propyne modified bases, 5-methylcytosine, 2-aminopurine, 2-amino-6-chloropurine, 2,6-diaminopurine, hypoxanthine, 2-thiouracil and pseudoisocytosine. In some embodiments, substitution(s) may include one or more substitutions/modifications in the sugars/bases, groups attached to the base, including biotin, fluorescent groups (fluorescein, cyanine, rhodamine, etc), chemically-reactive groups including carboxyl, NHS, thiol, etc., or any combination thereof.

A nucleic acid may be a peptide nucleic acid (PNA), locked nucleic acid (LNA), DNA, RNA, or co-nucleic acids of the same such as DNA-LNA co-nucleic acids. PNA are DNA analogs having their phosphate backbone replaced with 2-aminoethyl glycine residues linked to nucleotide bases through glycine amino nitrogen and methylenecarbonyl linkers. PNA can bind to both DNA and RNA targets by Watson-Crick base pairing, and in so doing form stronger hybrids than would be possible with DNA or RNA based oligonucleotides in some cases.

PNA are synthesized from monomers connected by a peptide bond (Nielsen, P. E. et al. Peptide Nucleic Acids, Protocols and Applications, Norfolk: Horizon Scientific Press, p. 1-19 (1999)). They can be built with standard solid phase peptide synthesis technology. PNA chemistry and synthesis allows for inclusion of amino acids and polypeptide sequences in the PNA design. For example, lysine residues can be used to introduce positive charges in the PNA backbone. All chemical approaches available for the modifications of amino acid side chains are directly applicable to PNA. Several types of PNA designs exist, and these include single strand PNA (ssPNA), bisPNA and pseudocomplementary PNA (pcPNA).

The structure of PNA/DNA complex depends on the particular PNA and its sequence. ssPNA binds to single stranded DNA (ssDNA) preferably in antiparallel orientation (i.e., with the N-terminus of the ssPNA aligned with the 3′ terminus of the ssDNA) and with a Watson-Crick pairing. PNA also can bind to DNA with a Hoogsteen base pairing, and thereby forms triplexes with double stranded DNA (dsDNA) (Wittung, P. et al., Biochemistry 36:7973 (1997)).

A locked nucleic acid (LNA) is a modified RNA nucleotide. An LNA form hybrids with DNA, which are at least as stable as PNA/DNA hybrids (Braasch, D. A. et al., Chem & Biol. 8(1):1-7(2001)). Therefore, LNA can be used just as PNA molecules would be. LNA binding efficiency can be increased in some embodiments by adding positive charges to it. LNAs have been reported to have increased binding affinity inherently.

Commercial nucleic acid synthesizers and standard phosphoramidite chemistry are used to make LNAs. Therefore, production of mixed LNA/DNA sequences is as simple as that of mixed PNA/peptide sequences. The stabilization effect of LNA monomers is not an additive effect. The monomer influences conformation of sugar rings of neighboring deoxynucleotides shifting them to more stable configurations (Nielsen, P. E. et al. Peptide Nucleic Acids, Protocols and Applications, Norfolk: Horizon Scientific Press, p. 1-19 (1999)). Also, lesser number of LNA residues in the sequence dramatically improves accuracy of the synthesis. Most of biochemical approaches for nucleic acid conjugations are applicable to LNA/DNA constructs.

These and other aspects of the invention are illustrated by the following non-limiting examples.

EXAMPLES

The following examples illustrate non-limiting embodiments of the invention.

Example 1: Design a Set of Capture Probes for a Human Target Exon

All targets are captured as a set of partially-overlapping subtargets. For example, in the tiling approach, a 200 bp target exon might be captured as a set of 12 subtargets, each 60 bp in length (FIG. 1 ). Each subtarget is chosen such that it partially overlaps two or three other targets.

In some embodiments, all probes are composed of three regions: 1) a 20 bp ‘targeting arm’ comprised of sequence which hybridizes immediately upstream from the sub-target, 2) a 30 bp ‘constant region’ comprised of sequence used as a pair of amplification priming sites, and 3) a second 20 bp ‘targeting arm’ comprised of sequence which hybridizes immediately downstream from the sub-target. Targeting arm sequences will be different for each capture probe in a set, while constant region sequence will be the same for all probes in the set, allowing all captured targets to be amplified with a single set of primers. Targeting arm sequences should be designed such that any given pair of 20 bp sequences is unique in the target genome (to prevent spurious capture of undesired sites). Additionally, melting temperatures should be matched for all probes in the set such that hybridization efficiency is uniform for all probes at a constant temperature (e.g., 60 C). Targeting arm sequences should be computationally screened to ensure they do not form strong secondary structure that would impair their ability to basepair with the genomic target.

Hybridize Capture Probes to Human Genomic Sample

Assemble Hybridization Reaction:

-   -   1.0 ul capture probe mix (˜2.5 μmol)     -   2.0 ul 10× Ampligase buffer (Epicentre)     -   6.0 ul 500 ng/ul human genomic DNA (˜16.7 fmol)     -   11 ul dH20     -   In a thermal cycler, heat reaction to 95 C for 5 min to denature         genomic DNA, then cool to 60 C. Allow to incubate at 60 C for 40         hours.

Convert Hybridized Probes into Covalently-Closed Circular Products Containing Subtargets

Prepare Fill-In/Ligation Reaction Mixture:

-   -   0.25 ul 2 mM dNTP mix (Invitrogen)     -   2.5 ul 10×Ampligase buffer (Epicentre)     -   5.0 ul 5 U/ul Taq Stoffel fragment (Applied Biosystems)     -   12.5 ul 5 U/ul Ampligase (Epicentre)     -   4.75 ul dH20

Add 1.0 ul of this mix to the hybridized probe reaction, and incubate at 60 C for 10 hours.

Purify Circularized Probe/Subtarget Products from Un-Reacted Probes and Genomic DNA

Prepare Exonuclease Reaction Mixture:

-   -   21 ul fill-in/ligation reaction product     -   2.0 ul 10×exonuclease I buffer (New England Biolabs)     -   2.0 ul 20 U/ul exonuclease I (New England Biolabs)     -   2.0 ul 100 U/ul exonuclease III (New England Biolabs)

Incubate at 37 C for 60 min, then heat-inactivate by incubating at 80 C for 15 min. Immediately cool to 4 C for storage.

Amplify Circular Material by PCR Using Primers Specific to the ‘Constant Region’ of the Probes

Prepare PCR Mixture:

-   -   5.0 ul 10×Accuprime reaction buffer (Invitrogen)     -   1.5 ul 10 uM CP-2-FA (5′-GCACGATCCGACGGTAGTGT-3′) (SEQ ID         NO:183)     -   1.5 ul 10 uM CP-2-RA (5′-CCGTAATCGGGAAGCTGAAG-3′) (SEQ ID         NO:184)     -   0.4 ul 25 mM dNTP mix (Invitrogen)     -   2.0 ul heat-inactivated exonuclease reaction mix     -   1.5 ul 10×SybrGreen (Invitrogen)     -   0.4 ul 2.5 U/ul Accuprime Pfx polymerase (Invitrogen)     -   37.7 ul dH20

Thermal cycle in real-time thermal cycler according to the following protocol, but stop cycling before amplification yield plateaus (generally 8-12 cycles):

-   -   1. 95 C for 5 min     -   2. 95 C for 30 sec     -   3. 58 C for 60 sec     -   4. 72 C for 60 sec     -   5. goto 2, N more times

Prepare a Shotgun Next-Generation Sequencing Library for Analysis

-   -   Purify desired amplicon population from non-specific         amplification products by gel extraction.     -   Concatemerize amplicons into high-molecular weight products         suitable for shearing     -   Mechanically shear, using either a nebulizer, BioRuptor,         Hydroshear, Covaris, or similar instrument. DNA should be         sheared into fragments several hundred basepairs in length.     -   Ligate adapters required for amplification by the sequencing         platform used. If necessary, purify ligated product from         unligated product and adapters.

Example 2: Use of Differentiator Tag Sequences to Detect and Correct Bias in a MIP-Capture Reaction of a Set of Exon Targets

The first step in performing the detection/correction is to determine how many differentiator tag sequences are necessary for the given sample. In this example, 1000 genomic targets corresponding to 1000 exons were captured. Since the differentiator tag sequence is part of the probe, it will measure/report biases that occur from the earliest protocol steps. Also, being located in the backbone, the differentiator tag sequence can easily be sequenced from a separate priming site, and therefore not impact the total achievable read-length for the target sequence.

MIP probes are synthesized using standard column-based oligonucleotide synthesis by any number of vendors (e.g. IDT), and differentiator tag sequences are introduced as ‘degenerate’ positions in the backbone. Each degenerate position increases the total number of differentiator tag sequences synthesized by a factor of 4, so a 10 nt degenerate region implies a differentiator tag sequence complexity of ˜1e6 species.

Hybridize Capture Probes to Human Genomic Sample

Assemble Hybridization Reaction:

-   -   1.0 ul capture probe mix (˜2.5 pmol)     -   2.0 ul 10×Ampligase buffer (Epicentre)     -   6.0 ul 500 ng/ul human genomic DNA (˜16.7 fmol)     -   11 ul dH20

In a thermal cycler, heat reaction to 95 C for 5 min to denature genomic DNA, then cool to 60 C. Allow to incubate at 60 C for 40 hours.

Convert Hybridized Probes into Covalently-Closed Circular Products Containing Subtargets

Prepare Fill-In/Ligation Reaction Mixture:

-   -   0.25 ul 2 mM dNTP mix (Invitrogen)     -   2.5 ul 10×Ampligase buffer (Epicentre)     -   5.0 ul 5 U/ul Taq Stoffel fragment (Applied Biosystems)     -   12.5 ul 5 U/ul Ampligase (Epicentre)     -   4.75 ul dH20

Add 1.0 ul of this mix to the hybridized probe reaction, and incubate at 60 C for 10 hours.

Purify Circularized Probe/Subtarget Products from Un-Reacted Probes and Genomic DNA

Prepare Exonuclease Reaction Mixture:

-   -   21 ul fill-in/ligation reaction product     -   2.0 ul 10×exonuclease I buffer (New England Biolabs)     -   2.0 ul 20 U/ul exonuclease I (New England Biolabs)     -   2.0 ul 100 U/ul exonuclease III (New England Biolabs)

Incubate at 37 C for 60 min, then heat-inactivate by incubating at 80 C for 15 min. Immediately cool to 4 C for storage.

Amplify Circular Material by PCR Using Primers Specific to the ‘Constant Region’ of the Probes

Prepare PCR Mixture:

-   -   5.0 ul 10×Accuprime reaction buffer (Invitrogen)     -   1.5 ul 10 uM CP-2-FA (5′-GCACGATCCGACGGTAGTGT-3′) (SEQ ID NO:         183)     -   1.5 ul 10 uM CP-2-RA (5′-CCGTAATCGGGAAGCTGAAG-3′) (SEQ ID NO:         184)     -   0.4 ul 25 mM dNTP mix (Invitrogen)     -   2.0 ul heat-inactivated exonuclease reaction mix     -   1.5 ul 10×SybrGreen (Invitrogen)     -   0.4 ul 2.5 U/ul Accuprime Pfx polymerase (Invitrogen)     -   37.7 ul dH20

Thermal cycle in real-time thermal cycler according to the following protocol, but stop cycling before amplification yield plateaus (generally 8-12 cycles):

-   -   6. 95 C for 5 min     -   7. 95 C for 30 sec     -   8. 58 C for 60 sec     -   9. 72 C for 60 sec     -   10. goto 2, N more times

Prepare a Shotgun Next-Generation Sequencing Library for Analysis

-   -   Purify desired amplicon population from non-specific         amplification products by gel extraction.     -   Concatemerize amplicons into high-molecular weight products         suitable for shearing     -   Mechanically shear, using either a nebulizer, BioRuptor,         Hydroshear,     -   Covaris, or similar instrument. DNA should be sheared into         fragments several hundred basepairs in length.     -   Ligate adapters required for amplification by the sequencing         platform used. If necessary, purify ligated product from         unligated product and adapters.

Perform Sequencing of Library According to Manufacturer's Directions (e.g. Illumina, ABI, Etc), Reading Both the Target Sequence and the Differentiator Tag Sequence.

Analyze Data by Correcting for any Biases Detected by Quantitation of Differentiator Tag Sequence Abundance

Construct a table of target: differentiator tag abundances from the read data, e.g.:

Target Differentiator ID Tag sequence ID Count 1 3547 1 2 4762 1 1 9637 1 1 1078 5 3 4762 1 1 2984 1

All ‘count’ entries should be ‘1’, since any particular target:differentiator tag mapping will not occur more than once by chance, and therefore will only be observed if bias was present somewhere in the sample preparation process. For any target:differentiator tag combination observed more than once, all such reads are ‘collapsed’ into a single read before consensus basecalls are determined. This will cancel the effect of bias on consensus basecall accuracy. FIG. 5 depicts a method for making diploid genotype calls in which repeat target:differentiator tag combination are collapsed.

Example 3: Differentiator Tag Sequence Design for MIP Capture Reactions

For a set of targets, the number of differentiator tag sequences necessary to be confident (within some statistical bounds) that a certain differentiator tag sequence will not be observed more than once by chance in combination with a certain target sequence was determined. The total number of unique differentiator tag sequences for a certain differentiator tag sequence length is determined as 4^((Length in nucleotides of the differentiator tag sequence)). For a molecular inversion probe capture reaction that uses MIP probes having differentiator tag sequences, the probability of performing the capture reaction and capturing one or more copies of a target sequence having the same differentiator tag sequence is calculated as: p=1−[N!/(N−M)!]/[NAM], wherein N is the total number of possible unique differentiator tag sequences and M is the number of target sequence copies in the capture reaction. Thus, by varying the differentiator tag sequence length it is possible to perform a MIP capture reaction in which the probability of capturing one or more copies of a target sequence having the same differentiator tag sequence is set at a predetermined probability value.

For example, for a differentiator tag sequence of 15 nucleotides in length, there are 1,073,741,824 possible differentiator tag sequences. A MIP capture reaction in which MIP probes, each having a differentiator tag sequence of 15 nucleotides, are combined with 10000 target sequence copies (e.g., genome equivalents), the probability of capturing one or more copies of a target sequence having the same differentiator tag sequence is 0.05. In this example, the MIP reaction will produce very few (usually 0, but occasionally 1 or more) targets where multiple copies are tagged with the same differentiator tag sequence. FIG. 6 depicts results of a simulation for 100000 capture reactions having 15 nucleotide differentiator tag sequences and 10000 target sequences.

Example 4: Assessment of the Probability for Obtaining Enough Sequencing Reads to Make Accurate Base-Calls at Multiple Independent Loci, as a Function of Sequencing Coverage

Monte Carlo simulations were performed to determine sequencing coverage requirements. The simulations assume 10000 genomic copies of a given locus (target) half mom alleles and half dad alleles. The simulations further assume 1% efficiency of capture for the MIP reaction. The simulation samples from a capture mix 100 times without replacement to create a set of 100 capture products. The simulation then samples from the set of 100 capture products with replacement (assuming unbiased amplification) to generate ‘reads’ from either mom or dad. The number of reads sampled depends on the coverage. The number of independent reads from both mom and dad necessary to make a high-quality base-call (assumed to be 10 or 20 reads) were then determined. The process was repeated 1000 times for each coverage level, and the fraction of times that enough reads from both parents were successfully obtained was determined. This fraction was raised to the power 1000, assuming we have 1000 independent loci that must obtain successful base-calls, plotted (See FIG. 7 ). Result show that roughly 50× coverage is required to capture each allele >=10× with >0.95 probability.

Example 5: MIP Capture of ‘Target’ Locus and ‘Control’ Loci

In some embodiments, to accurately quantify the efficiency of target locus capture, at least three sets of control loci are captured in parallel that have a priori been shown to serve as proxies for various lengths of target locus. For example, if the target locus is expected to have a length between 50 and 1000 bp, then sets of control loci having lengths of 50, 250, and 1000 bp could be captured (e.g. 20 loci per set should provide adequate protection from outliers), and their abundance digitally measured by sequencing. These loci should be chosen such that minimal variation in efficiency between samples and on multiple runs of the same sample is observed (and are therefore ‘efficiency invariant’). These will serve as ‘reference’ points that define the shape of the curve of abundance-vs-length. Determining the length of the target is then simply a matter of ‘reading’ the length from the appropriate point on the calibration curve.

In some embodiments, the statistical confidence one has in the estimate of target length from this method is driven largely by three factors: 1) reproducibility/variation of the abundance data used to generate the calibration curve; 2) goodness of fit of the regression to the ‘control’ datapoints; 3) reproducibility of abundance data for the target locus being measured. Statistical bounds on 1) and 2) will be known in advance, having been measured during development of the assay. Additionally, statistical bounds on 3) will be known in general in advance, since assay development should include adequate population sampling and measure of technical reproducibility. Standard statistical methods should be used to combine these three measures into a single P value for any given experimental measure of target abundance.

In some embodiments, given the set of calibration observations, and a linear regression fit to that data, the regression can be used to predict the length value for n observations of the target locus whose length is unknown. First, choose an acceptable range for the confidence interval of the length estimate. For example, in the case of distinguishing “normal” (87-93 bp) from “premutation” (165-600 bp) potential cases of Fragile X, the goal is to measure length to sufficient precision to distinguish 93 bp from 165 bp. The predicted response value, computed when n observations is substituted into the equation for the regressed line, will have arbitrary precision. However, if for example a 95% confidence level is desired, that 95% confidence interval must be sufficiently short that it does not overlap both the “normal” and “premutation” length ranges. Continuing the example, if one calculates a length of 190 from n=400 MIP observations, and based on the regression from calibration data, the 95% confidence interval is 190+/−20 bp, one can conclude the sample represents a “premutation” length with 95% certainty. Conversely, if the calibration data were less robust, error estimates of the regression would be higher, leading to larger confidence intervals on the predicted response value. In some embodiments, if the 95% CI were calculated as 190+/−100 bp from n=400, one could not determine whether the predicted response value corresponds to a “normal” or “premutation” length.

In some embodiments, the confidence interval for a predicted response is calculated as:

-   -   The estimate for the response ŷ is identical to the estimate for         the mean of the reponse: ŷ=b₀+b₁x*. The confidence interval for         the predicted value is given by ŷ±t*sŷ, where ŷ is the fitted         value corresponding to x*. The value t* is the upper (1−C)/2         critical value for the t(n−2) distribution.

In some embodiments, a technique for analyzing a locus of interest can involve the following steps.

Convert Hybridized Probes into Covalently-Closed Circular Products Containing Subtargets

-   -   Prepare Fill-In/Ligation Reaction Mixture:     -   0.25 ul 2 mM dNTP mix (Invitrogen)     -   2.5 ul 10×Ampligase buffer (Epicentre)     -   5.0 ul 5 U/ul Taq Stoffel fragment (Applied Biosystems)     -   12.5 ul 5 U/ul Ampligase (Epicentre)     -   4.75 ul dH20

Add 1.0 ul of this mix to the hybridized probe reaction, and incubate at 60 C for 10 hours.

Purify Circularized Probe/Subtarget Products from Un-Reacted Probes and 30 Genomic DNA

Prepare Exonuclease Reaction Mixture:

-   -   21 ul fill-in/ligation reaction product     -   2.0 ul 10×exonuclease I buffer (New England Biolabs)     -   2.0 ul 20 U/ul exonuclease I (New England Biolabs)     -   2.0 ul 100 U/ul exonuclease III (New England Biolabs)

Incubate at 37 C for 60 min, then heat-inactivate by incubating at 80 C for 15 min. Immediately cool to 4 C for storage.

Amplify Circular Material by PCR Using Primers Specific to the ‘Constant Region’ of the Probes

Prepare PCR Mixture:

-   -   5.0 ul 10×Accuprime reaction buffer (Invitrogen)     -   1.5 ul 10 uM CP-2-FA-Ilmn (platform-specific amplification         sequence plus ‘circle constant region’-specific sequence)     -   1.5 ul 10 uM CP-2-RA-Ilmn (platform-specific amplification         sequence plus ‘circle constant region’-specific sequence)     -   0.4 ul 25 mM dNTP mix (Invitrogen)     -   2.0 ul heat-inactivated exonuclease reaction mix     -   1.5 ul 10×SybrGreen (Invitrogen)     -   0.4 ul 2.5 U/ul Accuprime Pfx polymerase (Invitrogen)     -   37.7 ul dH20

Thermal cycle in real-time thermal cycler according to the following protocol, but stop cycling before amplification yield plateaus (generally 8-12 cycles):

-   -   11. 95 C for 5 min     -   12. 95 C for 30 sec     -   13. 58 C for 60 sec     -   14. 72 C for 60 sec     -   15. goto 2, N more times

Perform Sequencing (e.g., Next-Generation Sequencing) on Sample for Digital Quantitation According to Manufacturer's Instructions (e.g., Illumina, ABI)

Example 6: MIP-capture reaction of a set of exon target nucleic acids

MIP probes are synthesized using standard column-based oligonucleotide synthesis by any number of vendors (e.g. IDT).

Hybridize Capture Probes to Human Genomic Sample

Assemble Hybridization Reaction:

-   -   1.0 ul capture probe mix (˜2.5 pmol)     -   2.0 ul 10×Ampligase buffer (Epicentre)     -   6.0 ul 500 ng/ul human genomic DNA (˜16.7 fmol)     -   11 ul dH20

In a thermal cycler, heat reaction to 95 C for 5 min to denature genomic DNA, then cool to 60 C. Allow to incubate at 60 C for 40 hours.

Convert Hybridized Probes into Covalently-Closed Circular Products Containing Target Nucleic Acids

Prepare Fill-In/Ligation Reaction Mixture:

-   -   0.25 ul 2 mM dNTP mix (Invitrogen)     -   2.5 ul 10×Ampligase buffer (Epicentre)     -   5.0 ul 5 U/ul Taq Stoffel fragment (Applied Biosystems)     -   12.5 ul 5 U/ul Ampligase (Epicentre)     -   4.75 ul dH20

Add 1.0 ul of this mix to the hybridized probe reaction, and incubate at 60 C for 10 hours.

Purify, Circularized Probe/Target Nucleic Acid Products from Un-Reacted Probes and Genomic DNA

Prepare Exonuclease Reaction Mixture:

-   -   21 ul fill-in/ligation reaction product     -   2.0 ul 10×exonuclease I buffer (New England Biolabs)     -   2.0 ul 20 U/ul exonuclease I (New England Biolabs)     -   2.0 ul 100 U/ul exonuclease III (New England Biolabs)

Incubate at 37 C for 60 min, then heat-inactivate by incubating at 80 C for 15 min. Immediately cool to 4 C for storage.

Amplify Circular Material by PCR Using Primers Specific to the ‘Constant Region’ Of the Probes

Prepare PCR Mixture:

-   -   5.0 ul 10×Accuprime reaction buffer (Invitrogen)     -   1.5 ul 10 uM CP-2-FA (5′-GCACGATCCGACGGTAGTGT-3′) (SEQ ID NO:         183)     -   1.5 ul 10 uM CP-2-RA (5′-CCGTAATCGGGAAGCTGAAG-3′) (SEQ ID NO:         184)     -   0.4 ul 25 mM dNTP mix (Invitrogen)     -   2.0 ul heat-inactivated exonuclease reaction mix     -   1.5 ul 10×SybrGreen (Invitrogen)     -   0.4 ul 2.5 U/ul Accuprime Pfx polymerase (Invitrogen)     -   37.7 ul dH20

Thermal cycle in real-time thermal cycler according to the following protocol, but stop cycling before amplification yield plateaus (generally 8-12 cycles):

-   -   16. 95 C for 5 min     -   17. 95 C for 30 sec     -   18. 58 C for 60 sec     -   19. 72 C for 60 sec     -   20. goto 2, N more times

Prepare a Shotgun Next-Generation Sequencing Library for Analysis

-   -   Purify desired amplicon population from non-specific         amplification products by gel extraction.     -   Concatemerize amplicons into high-molecular weight products         suitable for shearing     -   Mechanically shear, using either a nebulizer, BioRuptor,         Hydroshear, Covaris, or similar instrument. DNA should be         sheared into fragments several hundred basepairs in length.     -   Ligate adapters required for amplification by the sequencing         platform used. If necessary, purify ligated product from         unligated product and adapters.

Perform Sequencing of Library According to Manufacturer's Directions (e.g. Illumina, ABI, Etc), Reading the Target Sequence to Determine Abundance of the Target Nucleic Acid.

Example 7: Use of MIPs, Hybridization, and Mutation-Detection MIPs to Genotype a Set of 1000 Targets

MIPs, hybridization, and mutation-detection MIPs are used to genotype a set of 1000 targets. The protocol permits detection of any of 50 specific known point mutations

First, separate MIP, hybridization, and mutation-detection MIP reactions are performed on a biological sample. A MIP capture reaction is performed essentially as described in Turner et al 2009, Nature methods 6:315-6. A set of MIPs is designed such that each probe in the set flanks one of the 1000 targets. Separately, a hybridization enrichment reaction is performed using the Agilent SureSelect procedure. Prior to selection, the genomic DNA to be enriched is converted into a shotgun sequencing library using Illumina's ‘Fragment Library’ kit and protocol. Agilent's web interface is used to design a set of probes which will hybridize to the target nucleic acids. Separately, a set of probes are designed (mutation-detection MIPs) which will form MIPs only if mutations (e.g., specific polymorphisms) are present. Each mutation-detection MIP has a 3′-most base identity that is specific for a single known mutation. A reaction with this set of mutation-detection MIPs is performed to selectively detect the presence of any mutant alleles.

Once all three reactions have been performed, the two MIP reactions are combined (e.g., at potentially non-equimolar ratios to further increase sensitivity of mutation detection) into a single tube, and run as one sample on the next-generation DNA sequencing instrument. The hybridization-enriched reaction is run as a separate sample on the next-generation DNA sequencing instrument. Reads from each ‘sample’ are combined by a software algorithm which forms a consensus diploid genotype at each position in the target set by evaluating the total coverage at each position, the origin of each read in that total coverage, the quality score of each individual read, and the presence (or absence) of any reads derived from mutation-specific MIPs overlapping the region.

It should be appreciated that the preceding examples are non-limiting and aspects of the invention may be implemented as described herein using alternative techniques and/or protocols that are available to one or ordinary skill in the art.

It will be clear that the methods may be practiced other than as particularly described in the foregoing description and examples. Numerous modifications and variations of the present disclosure are possible in light of the above teachings and, therefore, are within the scope of the claims. Preferred features of each aspect of the Disclosure are as for each of the other aspects mutatis mutandis. The documents including patents, patent applications, journal articles, or other disclosures mentioned herein are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety. In the event of conflict, the disclosure of present application controls, other than in the event of clear error. 

What is claimed is:
 1. A method for correcting for errors or bias introduced during nucleic acid analysis workflow, the method comprising the steps of: obtaining a biological sample comprising a plurality of target nucleic acid molecules from more than one locus of origin; introducing a set of differentiator tags, wherein members of said set of differentiator tags are associated with members of said plurality, such that one or more of said loci of origin are associated with more than one differentiator tag; amplifying each of the plurality of tagged target nucleic acid molecules to generate amplicons; sequencing the amplicons obtained in said amplifying step to obtain sequence reads of each of the amplicons, wherein each of the sequence reads comprises a target nucleic acid molecule sequence and a differentiator tag sequence; and correcting for error or bias introduced during said workflow by collapsing target:differentiator tag combinations observed more than once into a single count.
 2. The method of claim 1, wherein said correcting step further comprises collapsing all sequence reads comprising a same differentiator tag into a single read before determining a consensus base call for the target nucleic acid molecule sequences.
 3. The method of claim 2, further comprising the step of determining the presence of a sequencing or amplification error based upon a number of said differentiator tag sequences.
 4. The method of claim 1, wherein said biological sample is selected from the group consisting of blood and biopsy tissue.
 5. The method of claim 1, wherein said plurality of target nucleic acid molecules comprises bacterial or viral nucleic acids isolated from said biological sample.
 6. The method of claim 1, wherein said plurality of target nucleic acid molecules are circulating tumor nucleic acid molecules.
 7. The method of claim 1, further comprising the step of determining the copy number of a genomic region or transcript in a patient from whom the sample is obtained.
 8. The method of claim 1, wherein said plurality of target nucleic acid molecules are maternally-circulating fetal or placental nucleic acid molecules.
 9. A method for correcting for errors or bias introduced during nucleic acid analysis workflow, the method comprising the steps of: obtaining a biological sample comprising a plurality of target nucleic acid molecules from more than one locus of origin; introducing a set of unique differentiator tags, wherein members of said set of unique differentiator tags are randomly associated with members of said plurality of target nucleic acid molecules, such that any given tag is uniquely associated with said locus of origin; amplifying each of the plurality of tagged target nucleic acid molecules to generate amplicons; sequencing the amplicons obtained in said amplifying step to obtain sequence reads of each of the amplicons, wherein each of the sequence reads comprises a target nucleic acid molecule sequence and a differentiator tag sequence; and correcting for error or bias introduced during said workflow by recognizing target/differentiator tags having the same sequence as being derived from the same input molecule. 